>therefore bringing in millions of people from the tropics every year to maintain "economic growth" is total madness
There are many other reasons why bringing in people for economic growth is retarded.
Climate Change
>only way
nature still drains 11+6 Gton/year so cutting emissions below 17 would help
There are also many reasons why it actually does simulate economic growth.
such as
growth growth
economic growth
you better believe
its good for you
its good for me
la de du
lets get some
economic growth
growth
Read all of these:
epi.org
>america
I was considering western Europe, who doesnt use a green card vet system to pick out the good guys and uses illegals for the shitty labour.q
Before hitting this user's site consider the following:
The field of economics (and more generally, capitalism) is specifically designed to maximize the consumption of resources for the greatest number of people possible in the shortest amount of time, which is exactly the opposite of what we want to do to reduce the effects of climate change and non-renewable resource depletion.
Gotcha, I'm more familiar with the US, but I'm pretty sure immigration has been found to stimulate the economy in Europe too. European nations absolutely have vetting as though, don't pretend it doesn't exist. And the USA also has plenty of illegals too. The articles show how illegal immigration doesn't hurt the economy in the US either.
And I'll add that the "competitive spirit" that economists so cherish, is literally just a race to consume the most first.
Economics is a religion - the antithesis of science; the religion of consume.