inference-review.com
Anyone has some insight into this? I remember when it made a fuss the first time it came out in 2012, but it looks like people still can't understand it well enough to verify it?
Inter-universal Teichmüller Theory
Cooper Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
maths.nottingham.ac.uk
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Josiah Roberts
>Anyone has some insight into this?
it's still not understood enough to be peer reviewed, so the abc conjecture is for all intensive purposes still unproven
Cooper Stewart
>For all intensive purposes
For all intents and purposes.
Sebastian Sullivan
>he still can't grasp IUT
Julian Harris
>been 5 years
>still no watered down IUT textbook for beginners
Josiah Martinez
It would help if Mochizuki did not make a terminology hellhole out of it. The more special terms there are the harder it becomes for the mind to decrypt the semantics. It's like being lost in the seven index hells of linear algebra all over again,
Elijah Wright
>write an extremely obfuscatory paper
>actively refuse to provide any help to readers
>watch as brightest minds waste countless hours trying to decipher it
>laugh uncontrollably when you remember that the proof described isn't even valid
Mochizuki is the Duchamp of math.
Sebastian Hughes
is that always possible to avoid in high level mathematics?
Julian Phillips
>actively refuse to provide any help to readers
this is just wrong, he's even e-mailed me back before about questions I had
Leo Bennett
...