Is there a scientific reason as to why female homosexuality is more uncommon than male homosexuality?

Is there a scientific reason as to why female homosexuality is more uncommon than male homosexuality?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

same reason why there's more male to female transgenders than female to men, men are just way more likely to want to embrace the feminine role than the other way around

Are we all cucks ?

bump

No, women just have it better and men subconsciously want a piece of the action.
>inb4 /r9k/

Essentially, you're not wrong.

Without getting too psychoanalytic, males have fulfilled the protecting and providing role, which historically has been kinda shitty if you like your life comfy. The weight of the "masculine social construct" as sociologists call it is in fact quite heavy.

As a human, you are inclined to take the path of least resistance, your life is based around improving your day to day living by algorithms. Since protection and provision are no longer difficult, it makes sense to me that some would cast off the traditional role, as it is "needlessly" difficult in modern society, where women can get jobs/provide, and there's little to no danger in first world suburbia and cities.

As for homosexuality, idk, women can't penetrate each other without dildos, whereas men can penetrate and receive, with the receiving male getting his prostate stimulate, so it could improve the sensation ten-fold.

That's on top of the fact that testosterone just increases libido, not necessarily directed only at women. Go browse Veeky Forums sometime...

It's actually like twice as common, OP. Not sure why you arbitrarily assume it's less.

Nice that the science board is filled with pseuds who opine on topics they know nothing about.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

>Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is now usually understood as a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]

> Don't forget argument from fallacy.
He may have used fallacy but they still have burden of proof on their side and i choose to use hitchens razor too. If we don't get some citations we should dismiss those arguments.

Being female is much more easier than being a male
That's why there are a lot of male to female trans but not the opposite
/thread

Yes, homosexuality is caused by a pathogen. Since men are more promiscuous than women, the pathogen spreads much faster among men infected with it than women.

Plainly untrue.

Sexual dysphoria has nothing to do with homosexuality.

westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/

>female homosexuality is more uncommon than male homosexuality
[citation needed]

>Sexual dysphoria has nothing to do with homosexuality.
[citation needed]

Maybe it has to do with testosterone
It makes men want to stick their dicks in anything
>vagina
>pool vacuum
>knothole of a tree
>melon
>buttholes

Pinpoint the implication that it did
I'm having trouble locating it

This sounds like colonial america-era science
We should have an RP thread about that some time

>why female homosexuality is more uncommon than male homosexuality

Got a source for this?
Because I'm not convinced it's true.

>female homosexuality is more uncommon
Is it thought?

From personal experience it seems that female bisexuals are even more common than monosexual females (gay or straight)

Homosexuality virus is more likely to infect XY individuals than XX, because as you can clearly see it's easier to pass through a XYXYXYXY wall rather than a XXXXXXXX, there's less space in the latter.

I have no scientific proof to back this up, but based on a lot of self observations I'm pretty certain that a major part of women are actually bisexual rather than 100% straight.

it is literally the most likely hypothesis

If someone found medicine that turned gays straight, would it be ethical to give them it?

I'm afraid there is none.

Actually bissexuality is far more common in woman than in man, don't know why though

You sound like an imbecile.

Sexuality is a meme.

Yes and it's not even impossible


Just wait until we truly understand the human genome and crispr gets good

This board is basically the new /pol/, all the broscience is sickening. It's incredible just how many morons over there thought that dumping their shitty opinions on a board called science would somehow make them more scientific.

Same for men senpai. Male homosexuality is more stigmatized by society tho.

If someone found medicine that turned fat neckbeards in cute lolis, would it be ethical to give them it?

>being gay is being female

Lesbians: cuddling with each other until they both find men in their 30's

Bi-homos/traps: having sex with other men, using them as their prostate massagers

True homos: sad miserable faggots who likes smelling shit and ripping their asses with aids ridden dicks

Lesbians seems very comfy.

I realize 1hour ago that women cannot be asexual.
Women love sex and love to desire sex.

Men love sex but they do not love much nor dislike much the desire for sex. In fact the desire for sex is more like an hindrance and a thing to eject, precisely by wanking and ejaculation that is the pinnacle of fucking a slag.
men still despise not loving sex, since it removes the most effective mechanism of valuation that they have, which leads them to the usual mockery of being shagless didlos remaingin on the shelf, being baby dicks and being asexual.
Men despise asexuality in men since it shows them to be far less dominant than the story they plays in their heads

Women despise asexuality in men, since the few asexual men (very few are handsome) no longer acknowledge women for sex nor for companionship. Some asexual men claim to still want a gf just to cuddle, but that's already a baby-level sex and we are still in the situation of validation (and the gf still wants sex anyway sooner or later) and once they have sex with a girl they love they see sex is not so bad.

Women despise asexuality in women, precisely because women live on sex while their hate of their body for menstruating leads them to take pills which kills their desire for sex (but indeed kills their menstruation). They hate their life since through their own body, they acknowledge in their intimacy that they cannot win on both accounts: either have a comfy life or have an erotic life.

ITT:
>women are this way
>men are that way
>homosexuality is like this
>entire lives are dictated by these basic sets of rules, no exceptions
>it's so simple guys

Was Bill Nye indeed right, sexualism is on the spectrum?

yes

It's true. It ranges from a 1% to almost 4% difference, there is never a case where it was reported more females identified as homosexual than males as homosexual.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation
Read the "Modern Survey Results" section. The numbers are backed up by its source so click the reference when in doubt. In the UK and some other countries homosexuals were mashed in with bisexuals so ignore those numbers as they aren't relevant, the numbers that segregate homosexuality by gender are the important ones.

Colourblindness is also more common in men than in women. Maybe it's just something genetic.

You mean men have greater capacity libidos than most women, only more hornier women can compete with the average mans libido, this goes for most of the animal kingdom too it's an evolutionary adaptation.

Interestingly there's more bisexual women than men though.

woaooohhhh deeep