scientificamerican.com
nature.com
So, have we got a big one?
"Modern Man" Ain't so Modern
Jacob Rodriguez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
boneclones.com
twitter.com
Jaxon Morgan
Pretty neat read.
Matthew Perez
HOL UP
Tyler Hill
>modern humans
There's really too many races with skulls that are vastly different to have a catch-all for skull shapes. Also, sloping isn't really a thing that determines stuff like this.
Benjamin Richardson
Again? We got those skeletons in Greece and now this.
Jaxson Reyes
yep it's interesting to see what comes off this.
maybe we're not all from africa after all.
Blake Johnson
Agreed it really is amazing how over the course of a mere 7 million years two different species ended up in two different places.
Benjamin Lewis
One of those skull is human and the other is neanderthal you idiot.
Also, what you /pol/tards don't realize is that there is always variation within any population. There are not skull shapes or physical appearances that are completely unique to any race.
Asher Long
Neanderthal's and Homo Sapiens are literal cousins.
Neanders went north to North Africa and Europe while Homo Sapiens stayed in Africa until x-amount of time and moved Northward and Eastward breeding with Neanders and their Asian cousin (The name slip my mind).
Christian Carter
There were people shutting it down since the 60's, however things slip through the cracks. Expect older bones to be discovered in 6 months
Xavier Martinez
>neanderthal
That's an abo, user.
Hunter Watson
yfw cremo was right
>youtube.com
Ryder Sanchez
So what does this mean for race?
Surely white looking humans couldnt have existed in 300,000 B.C.
Thomas Ross
It means that Blacks and whites are cousins and not the same line
Kevin Morales
No thats ludicrous, niggers and whites are recent homo sapiens, what I want to know is if the base human body plan has existed since 300,000 B.C.
Sebastian Bailey
>No thats ludicrous
How so? We have a common ancestor much further back we just ended up as cousins somewhere along the way.
Eli Bennett
There is literally no legitimate evidence that one is an abo. Reverse image search just shows Veeky Forums and personal blogs.
Not museums, research papers or anything legitimate to support your outlandish claim.
Nathan Torres
boneclones.com
>This human male Australian Aboriginal skull was found in 1905 near the lower Darling River in New South Wales, Australia, and was known to be from a very stout 50-year-old male of the Bindaboo Tribe. It is available in natural bone color or painted to match the original specimen. This specimen highlights the limitations of categorization (oversimplification) into 3 categories-European, African, and Asian. The totality of features here is most in keeping with those of mixed traits (African and Asian). For an osteological evaluation report (PDF), a copy of which will be sent with the purchase of this specimen, go to BC-031-Report. 2-part skull (separate cranium & jaw).
Brandon Nelson
that's just even more evidence for time travellers
Bentley Butler
...
Connor Carter
Doesn't do anything to challenge anything scientists believe. Saharan Desert was not a desert 300k years ago. It was more of a grassland. Out of Africa is based more on genetics than fossils.
Ian Rodriguez
so there is a conspiracy to help a certain therory? hmm
Andrew Adams
I guess we won't see this SJW in this thread again.
William Torres
I'm not going to say cultural marxism but it's cultural marxism.
Protip look at the race/ethnicity of the group that is least likely to marry the sub species
Xavier Butler
even if we are different sub races what does this imply? we are all the same specie after all