James Joyce Critique

Why is this man invincible? I cant find anyone who actually critisizes his work, what are some faults?

he has no faults. any that could be perceived are attributed to his genius anyway. he makes a typo? well, turns out here in this 1732 copy of dogshit memes, it has this spelling as well, so it must be a reference to this work. He really took it to such a level that his critics end up being twisted into traps like that, almost ashamed of coming out with anything against him, for fear there was some piece they were missing.

>literal cuckold
>Fart fetishist
>Probably a pedophile
>Writing is too dense and incoherent to understand
>Rambles on like an autist
>People find random connections and references in his work when there is actually nothing of note
>Reading his books will leave you with less IQ and erectile dysfunction

Fuckin try it, I dare you. Literally the only dissenters are edgy teens or jealous writers.

FUCK "Penelope"

FUCK IT

I made it through most of Ulysses over the course of a few months, but I have literally spent weeks slogging through "Penelope" because it's so fucking infuriating to read

FUCK PENELOPE

Actual retard detected. this is one of the easiest chapters in the book

A bit harsh, but I can agree with the sentment.

>Making it through Oxen of Apollo
>Stumbling at Penelope

>I cant find anyone who actually critisizes his work
Who's qualified? He was light years ahead of the critics, or at least successfully gave that impression.

I'm battling through the Wake right now. The biggest criticism I have is that so much of it seems like baby language, which can be irritating. Still, if you're going to read Joyce you have to expect tests of endurance, so I'm sticking with it.

>criticising Joyce on moral grounds
Congrats, you've reached a level of understanding that was prominent in 1922.

Give it another century, and you might catch up with the rest of humanity.

read exiles.