Android calculator

-∞ and +∞ are the same

for 100/0 to be infinity, 0 would have to be capable of converging to a whole number.
you cant fucking divide by 0 brainlets

infinity isnt a number anyway, its just a fucking mathematical constant

>mathematical constant
>isnt a number
???

oh shit i guess i spelled wrong and it corrected to constant, but i meant concept

...

>all these brainlets not knowing the projective real line

100/0 = x
Therefore 100 = x*0
Nothing satisfies x
Simple algebra people

Um excuse me sweetie but ur a liar

Say what?

Hey guys can I prove op wrong too

Good bait.

...

...

It's worse than that. Try typing in 0^0.

It says 0^0=1 which is true

...

Then an integral from -inf to inf would always equal zero.

Class what's 0 squared?
0 !!!
What's 0^1?
0 !!!!
What's the square root of 0?
0 !!!!
What's 0^(1/998999888)?
0 !!!!
What's 0^0?
>drool coming from his mouth the class retard enters the room
1 !!!!

nice meme

>implying its retarded
can you back your claim?
[math]\text{Proof that the function }f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\text{ given by:}[/math]
[eqn]f(x) = 0^x[/eqn] [math]\text{Is continuous on }\mathbb{R}[/math]

they are in a riemann sphere

issuetracker.google.com/issues/36928447

fancy bait

X^0 was deemed to be one because it followed a pattern.
Let"
X^n=r
Where n>0: r >1. As n diverges to infinity so does r.
Where n

All you piggots need to learn some basic projective geometry...

best calculator reporting in

...

What is your calculator?
Mine is ok and gives the same result

Infinity is a Christian concept that has overstayed it's welcome in math. It's a meaningless concept that the field of mathematics would do well to get rid of.

Look piggot. Let me break it down for you. Pay attention.

Do you know what your problem is? You don't know what [math]a^b[/math] even means.

[math]a^b[/math] is the number of functions from [math][b][/math] to [math][a][/math].

This basic definition extends to all cardinal numbers. Why do you think the power set of [math]X[/math] is denoted as [math]2^X[/math]? Yeah. it's because of the basic definition of the operator "^" that I just posted, piggot.

So then, tell me, what is [math]0^0[/math]? In other words, how many functions are there from the empty set to the empty set?

By the way, you fucking retard (and yes this is still me, the guy from )

Hey piggot, what's 0 factorial?

Let me educate you about that too, since you obviously need it.

n! is the number of *bijections* [math]f:[n]\rightarrow[n][/math].

So then, tell me, what is 0 factorial? In other words, how many *bijections* are there from the empty set to the empty set?

based

Listen here you blithering nigger. I said 0^0 CAN be 1 depending on definitions and circumstances.
an example of indeterminate values would be the second answer here:
math.stackexchange.com/questions/714170/what-is-infinity-to-the-power-zero

>Defending axioms with passion
kekkest

You should only ever study code theory. LIterally the best thingever i m nsdajsi je o jkfrei j krjwjwfhwjkfhwejkhwejkwhjkwh

what shitty phones you got

It's true

Leonhard Euler would have agreed with your phone, by the way. Your phone is better at math than you

you-ler?

...

But on the real projective line it does
also
>implying integrating over all of R is "integrating from -inf to inf"

Wow, it implicitly takes the limit? That's really fucking cool!

u live in spain

I guess they use the extended reals.

do you mean the extended real line?

what phone do you use

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory

>Windows calculator
>1^(1/3)=0.333...

But, that's just correct.
>inb4 some pleb talks about +-infinity
fuck off