If you were traveling at the speed of light, from your perspective you are still, and everyone thing else around you is moving backward... at the speed of light.
Einstein says all reference frames are equally valid. And that means things with mass are traveling at light speed.
from the perspective of a reference frame that is moving at the speed of light every point in the universe is collocated and things observed from that reference frame appear not to be moving forward in time.
Luis Nguyen
>Reference frame >Moving at the speed of light Neither of you understand relativity, fuck off.
Zachary Flores
>jumping through mental hoops this badly to defend some dead guy like a sort of religion I thought science was supposed to accept new evidence and not stick to archaic traditions?
John Price
>two objects are moving away from each other at the speed of light >mfw one object is moving at twice the speed of light compared to the reference point of the other object
Cooper Phillips
what is spatial dilation for 500 Alex?
nothing violates the speed of light, space and time literally warp to make it impossible.
well if you were a photon, or in this thought experiment, perceiving the universe from the perspective of a photon then everything said there was true
>accept new evidence what new evidence? everything ever tested has confirmed general relativity.
Hunter Garcia
Photons don't have a rest frame.
Gabriel Morgan
feel free to articulate a coherent position any time
Xavier Cooper
Photons don't have a rest frame, it's implicit in one of the principles of relativity, if c is the same in all frames there photons can't have a frame, else there would be a frame where the speed of a photon is 0. It should be pretty obvious, if you aren't a brainlet. If you're still having trouble with understanding that, try boosting into a frame that's moving at c.
Evan Powell
>doesn't understand the point of a thought experiment.
of course "things" cant move at the speed of light.