We have never seen any evidence of type II or type III civilizations anywhere. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. If they could exist, they would exist. Furthermore, Type III's are the easiest to see, and we haven't seen one.
I think anything beyond type I is impossible or totally unnecessary for biological life. Earth might be a type I by the end of the century if we don't destroy ourselves. This would explain the fermi paradox since planetary communication is non-radio and digital and basically undetectable from Earth.
There are no dyson sphere signatures and there are no galactic structures either.
Zachary Evans
We've never seen evidence of intelligence in your brain anywhere either, and you're probably around 20 years old. If there was any there, we'd see it in your posts. Furthermore smartposts are the easiest to see since most of Veeky Forums is shitposting, and we haven't seen one.
Wyatt Morgan
>believing the kardashians wtf
James Peterson
donk
Owen Bailey
It's an arbitrary scale, how can it be bullshit? It's not claiming that any of these civilisation actually exist, it's just a way of classifying them if they did.
Leo Reyes
>humans might reach type 3 in a few hundred thousand to a million years
about as optimistic as you can get
Camden Rivera
What makes you think you'd be able to perceive a type 2 unless they wanted you to, much less a type 3? If they're out there, keeping a low profile is going to be important, lest you attract the attention of someone else as or more powerful.
Jason Baker
We arent even type 1 and we can already create nanomaterial, wouldnt a type 2 civilization be operating on planck physics?
Most advanced aliens in our reality probably dont use EM radiation as a way to communicate because its primitive from their point of view, instead they use something we have to discover.
Aaron Stewart
The star within a solar system is 99% of it's mass so how the fuck can you use the resources within said system to enclose the star?
Easton Garcia
We haven't even examined 1% of the observable universe, let alone the 'whole' universe. There is no way you can say with 100% certainty that we're the only living, or intelligent beings in the entire universe. Considering the amount of Earth-like planets and planets in the Goldilocks zone and the possibility of unusual xenobiology, I think it is highly likely there are other living and intelligent beings in the universe. Considering the size of it and the complexity of travel within it, it isn't too much of a shocker that we haven't found anyting else yet. Though we might. Making platitudinal and ignorant statements, showing the arrogance within, is pointless. We may, or may not find life, that doesn't mean we shouldn't consider the implications and possibilities. Also, to close, I didn't know Veeky Forums stocked so many armchair Nostradamuses.
Caleb Miller
>It's an arbitrary scale, how can it be bullshit? Not OP, but... It implies that more advanced civilizations have a higher population and/or less efficient use of energy. Both those ideas seem backwards to me.
Tyler Bennett
I'm pretty sure it's just a science fiction term no different from the power levels they give dbz characters.
Nobody but flat-earthers believes in FTL anymore.
Aiden Lewis
More advanced civilizations do have more population, as more people means more specialist researchers and it does not at all imply less efficient use of energy, it revolves around increased access to energy
Jackson Howard
>muh sci-fi civilization scaler is rubbish
Complain about it on kid.
Carson Robinson
Serious question from a pleb;
If we are not in the "center" of the universe and we are only able to see ~14 billion light years, how do we know there aren't civilizations beyond what we're able to observe. Barring that, have we actually been able to observe anything other than radiation from distant galaxies? According to OP, we know of every single planet in the entire universe and have studied it in detail, how do we accomplish this for stars that are 13 billion light years away?
Dominic Garcia
Kek
Andrew Gutierrez
wrong question, how do you even know there is a space to travel through?
Camden Young
this, we could make a new one right now. it doesn't mean anything.
Charles Jenkins
Water is level. The size of the container doesnt matter. Earth is mostly water, and water is level, so earth is a level plane. Because it must be...right?
Jose Perry
>The kardashev scale is bullshit.
It's basically an arbitrary scale.
You could equally measure civilizations by the amount of electron volts they can capture.
Carson Williams
the scale is bullshit, because it's based on egocentric worldview, that assumes all sentient life behaves like energy hungry super virus, when our sample size is literally one, and we are hardly a shining example of what an advanced civilization should look like.
Gabriel Wright
>the scale is bullshit, because it's based on egocentric worldview, that assumes all sentient life behaves like energy hungry super virus
You need energy to power life, and dedicating more energy to your life gives you more chance of reproducing.
It's practically necessary for successful life forms to behave/evolve this way, to the extent that they can find the energy to support it.
Jacob Wright
Attila pls f/go and stay go
Anthony Lopez
Arbitary but not bullshit. The fact of the matter is it takes energy to survive and more energy = more survival. Type 3 was a good stopping point because harnessing the energy of the universe or beyond is essentially just religion again.
Evan Nelson
A sentient planet automatically reaches type 2. It could, for all intents and purposes, have the intellect of a 2 year old.
Dylan Hughes
>some sci-fi writer says LOL PLANET, LOL STAR, LOL GALAXY There is no reason to assume anything that Kardashev said is valid or notable. They are simple musings of a person who likes sci-fi.
Matthew Williams
There's no rule that civilizations are bound to reach any level or progress to another once reaching one.
Aaron Myers
There's no rule saying that there will be any useful rules or scales that could measure them YET HERE WE ARE
Justin Johnson
Type 1 just assume some level of planetary colonization that implies control (aka weather machines) not that any planet would need a weather machine, making the Type 1 classification meaningless. At best it is an arbitrary way of saying "yeah we rule the planet"
Type 2 is assuming either a dyson sphere (dumbest possible idea of all dyson's ideas) or solar mining for matter. Which either means you're simply skimming for hydrogen that is just as easy to get from a gas giant or you're eating the entire star to transmute into other materials through an artificial supernova.
Now would a Type 2 eat stars before or after they colonized multiple solar systems? I'd hope after.
Type 3 eats an entire galaxy of stars and more, for whatever purpose, I guess to build more artificial space stations and spaceships for whatever purpose the civ thinks it needs.
Type 3 is stupid because it uses the same technology as Type 2 (mining stars for resources) it is just a Type 2 where you do it a few million times more.
Its so fucking stupid with the giant leap between Type 1 and Type 2 and that Type 2 and Type 3 are literally the same.
Luke Nelson
It's kind of hard to hide a days on sphere.
Lucas Nelson
we can detect the energy emitted by stars if a star is there, but emits a lot of infrared, and fuckall anything else, we'd be able to detect them
Jaxson Nelson
>type 2-3 civ fires supernova weapon at star >SPLATDOOSH! >ooh supernova, pretty >vacuums up the star and mines the white dwarf for metal >scientists wonder why they don't see any supernova remanants from a supernova that happened 50+ years go
or
>star goes dark >not there anymore >that's weird And that's if we're lucky that it is close enough to notice and we were looking both before and after.
Signals attenuate over long distances into worthless static so unless its fucking close there's nothing we'd even be able to see with an ideal telescope.
Brayden Thompson
Why are you assuming they're building a dyson sphere that emits infared?
Why would a type 2 or 3 civilization even want to build a dyson sphere? I'm sure they have a better use for their time and resources.
Tyler Ortiz
The lithosphere of a planet is, like, 1% of the mass of the planet. How does it surround the rest of the planet?
Also: Mine the material from your star. There's about 500 Earths worth of metals in the Sun.
Leo Barnes
If you're mining the star why bother to enclose it?
Oliver Collins
because the shit you are lifting from the star is helium and heavier, which is poison for the star
if you suck out that, and dump new hydrogen in, you could keep a star going forever
Kayden Phillips
>our sample size is literally one >we are hardly a shining example of what an advanced civilization should look like. Way to completely undermine yourself in a single sentence.
James Green
First, there is no such thing as "poison" for a star. That's pop science Second, you would need ridiculous amounts of hydrogen to keep a star going
Hudson Robinson
>use all resources on homeworld >homeworld is now a lifeless rock I seriously hope we don't do this
Dominic Watson
No, white dwarfs for example consume relatively low amounts of Hydrogen.
Jeremiah Hernandez
also ridiculous amounts of energy and martial to build and operate such a structure, probably more than could be harnessed from the start over it's lifespan
Josiah Morales
They mean converting all available geothermal heat, sunlight that hits the surface and probably shit like tides and falling water all into electricity, not mining out the core you fucking twat.
Cooper Brooks
white dwarves don't make energy stupid
Hudson Wilson
also wind and all available fuels
Alexander Barnes
and how the fuck is anything supposed to live with no solar or geothermal energy retard?
Ethan White
are you fucking high?
Ian Phillips
>There are no dyson sphere signatures and there are no galactic structures either.
yes, everybody, except for the faggots on /x/, already know this.
Carter Gonzalez
We actually see evidence of dyson spheres. Tabis star may be one. Plus, if you have fusion energy, then you dont need to harvest whole suns.
It is easier to create an actual sun than to build a sphere around it. So K1 civilisations will likely stay K1 until they reach the exponential explosion point of spreading. My point is that in a causally isolated universe, there is probably only 1 >= K2 covilisation, because it expanded so fast that other civilisations were terminated.
So we will be the first such civilisation :) Im really looking forward to this.
Elijah Evans
Lol you are stupid. they have nuclear fusion going on inside them. That is why they emit white light.
Juan Price
...
Evan Rogers
I believe it is about the ability to battery/utilize this energy at will, not immediately consume it all.
Nicholas Peterson
White dwarfs radiate thermal energy but are out of fuel. They're just a ball of electrons.
Ryan Sanchez
I think we already have an explanation for the tabis phenomenon
Ryan Moore
what is it?
Ian Gomez
I think there is a huge asteroid belt around the star Not sure though
Kayden Hall
reminder that Spheres are impossible, but SWARMS are not, and are ridiculously easy to make, what with them being just a fuckton of individual habitats and collectors in a foggy cloud around the star
you don't need to go make the whole thing in a day, you just make a single habitat, and then another, and another, gradually until you get your swarm