>scientists have to invent pseudoscience BS like the multiverse just to avoid the fact the fined tuned argument is solid evidence of God's existance, therefore making their atheism obsolete
>mfw I though scientists used to believe in shit like Ocam razor and looking at the evidence without ideology
>tfw science can't escape ideology
Scientists have to invent pseudoscience BS like the multiverse just to avoid the fact the fined tuned argument is solid...
Jayden Diaz
Other urls found in this thread:
Veeky
en.wikipedia.org
journals.aps.org
twitter.com
Caleb Flores
you are a smart guy
Jaxson Harris
For you.
Joshua Martin
Veeky Forums.org/rules#sci
See if you can find which one you broke, brainlet.
Levi Powell
I'm not talking about religion retard.
I'm talking about how scientists don't accept the fined tuned universe because of ideology.
Grayson Carter
>solid evidence
Hahahahahhaha
Oh wait, you're serious?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
All joking aside, weak bait
Gavin Ramirez
this is true, it can also be shown mathematically using modal logic as in Kurt Gödel's Ontological Proof
Andrew Wood
he is referring to the fine tuning constants of quantum electrodynamics which have been measured to many decimal points to be very precisely defined real numbers
Carson Martin
The Ontological Proof (at least as I've seen it explained by atheists that can understand logicianspeak better than I can) asserts that God can neither be proven nor disproven using logic, not that it's literal proof a God exists.
Joseph Reed
see
Lucas Gomez
>solid evidence of God's existence
>not related to religion
Jeremiah Murphy
Should there be a rule limiting Veeky Forums to one christfag thread at a time?
Nathaniel Rogers
>he doesn't know the fine tuned constants proved intelligent design
Henry Moore
The constants are not "fine tuned"
Maybe for this planet...IF we are lucky enough to get to space travel and resource harvesting...
As for the existance of God...how about I wager this.
If your God can get us all acces to space and the cosmos I will accept him in full...
Jayden Gomez
Oh hey, what's this?
journals.aps.org
>This result suggests that there is no necessity to introduce the cosmological constant, which is required to be fine tuned to an accuracy of 10−120, or other forms of dark energy, which are required to have peculiar negative pressure, to explain the observed accelerating expansion of the Universe.
Carter Cooper
Saying "science proves that my religion is real" doesn't mean this isn't a retarded religion thread that belongs on /pol/.
Aaron Morgan
The multiverse does not exclude God....
To understand the multiverse you gotta understand chaos....
Alexander Young
Not all scientists
Caleb Martin
The laws of the universe are completely arbitrary and the fact that they are 'perfect' means nothing at all.
Christopher Gonzalez
>he doesn't know how grant chasing works
kek
Jacob Sanders
That isn't science....That is science business.
Dylan Williams
All ontological arguments are inherently circular. You can use it to prove that literally anything exists.