I just published this paper that PROVES the answer is B:
journalofsci.weebly.com
I just published this paper that PROVES the answer is B:
Christopher Diaz
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Juan Ross
im not convinced yet, I disagree with the claim in figure 2
the cube is only traveling at -v velocity from our frame of reference.
From the cube's frame of reference it has been traveling at a steady +v
newtons law of motion has not been violated the object has maintained constant velocity it only appears different to those not within the cube's frame of reference
Wyatt Taylor
to support my claim that frame of reference matters and that law of motion was not violated, pick related.
Parker Phillips
>From the cube's frame of reference it has been traveling at a steady +v
What? WHAT? From the cubes perspective... it's not moving at all. Like when you drive in your car, it looks like you are standing still and the entire earth is rotating under you. From the car's perspective, the car is not moving.
It is impossible for a cube to be moving relative to the cube itself... the cube is always in the same place as the cube.
Luke Davis
>What? WHAT? From the cubes perspective
yes, idiot, from the cube's perspective
any change in the cubes velocity would cause the cube to experience an inertial change. there has been no inertial change to the cube.
Jaxon Sullivan
Dear god is this a troll?
In both cases the ball is travelling in the postitive x-hat direction. The velocity vector for both of them is the same:
velocity vector = v*x-hat + 0*y-hat
Dylan Turner
So you agree that from the cube's perspective, the speed is 0?
Gavin Sullivan
yes, i agree that from the cubes frame of reference it is staying still and everything around it is moving at v
I dont agree that it experiences any change in velocity upon entering/exiting a portal. I am asserting that only those observing it witness what APPEARS to be a change in velocity
Cameron Reed
I would also agree that from an observer's frame of reference it appears to change velocity (direction), but this is only a quirk of the portal effect. Because the cube has experience no inertial changes, its velocity has not actually changed.
Lincoln Ward
>I dont agree that it experiences any change in velocity upon entering/exiting a portal
Well good because I don't believe that either.
>"We should established that no forces are acting on the cube. We can say with certainty that the cube’s velocity will be the exact same throughout the entire experiment."