There are lots of scientists out there whose biggest intellectual accomplishment is speaking against God

There are lots of scientists out there whose biggest intellectual accomplishment is speaking against God.
This is fucking sad. Think about it.

Personally I'm sick and tired of this fad. Guys like Lawrence Krauss study 20 years of hard science and then feel proud when they realize that hey, maybe religion can be used to brainwash simple people into obedience. They don't discover new particles, they don't develop any new science of any kind. They just preach atheism to retards and reap fame doing so.
It doesn't take a particle physicist to question God. IQ 70 people are doing it these days because atheism is the rising trend. I always cringe when I see Dawkinses strutting around the stage like peacocks feeling superior when they're telling a muslim that they need to update their world views.
It's like a boxing match between Mike Tyson and a crippled child.

Maybe new thinkers in the 21st century get edgy and start criticizing atheism and re-introduce the God hypothesis.
Questioning the status quo is a baby step on a thinker's path. Yet we have renowned scientists who never get further than this.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_M._Krauss#Scientific_work
plato.stanford.edu/entries/prop-attitude-reports/ignorance.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Look into Post-Modernism.

Science is already dead.

How to be edgy:

>20th century
>question religion

>21st century
>question atheism

>22nd century
>question previous questioning of atheism

and so on.
This is how collective thinking works. It's slow and never goes anywhere, it just oscillates between two extremes indefinitely.
Homosexuality was accepted in ancient Greece, then it was banned, now it's acceptable again. This is how it goes. Most people are idiots and can't make decisions of their own.

Scientists shouldn't even touch these subjects. They should make science.

Everything you said was wrong though. There was no such thing as homosexuality in greek times. It was not an identity.

>It was not an identity

Fucking another man in the ass is homosexuality by definition.
Don't let modern feminism delude you into thinking sexualities and genders are borderless. Not having a gender is also not a gender.

>Fucking another man in the ass is homosexuality by definition.
Ah, so women aren't homosexual. Got it.

>Don't let modern feminism delude you into thinking sexualities and genders are borderless. Not having a gender is also not a gender.
Humans don't have gender. Humans have sexes.

Intergender pansexual helicopter does not pass for a sex.
God created man and woman. Remember that in all your wisdom.

Man created god. Still good though. God is what we should all aspire to be.

Jesus took on the cross to tell us all that in order to live a good life we must all assume responsibility for humanity.

>Intergender pansexual helicopter does not pass for a sex.

I think you should read about the difference between sex and gender. Sex is biological. Gender is identity (hence psychological bullshit).

Gender does not apply to living things.

The first person who thought it was a social construct was a pedophile who systematically abused his patients until they killed themselves.

Look into John Money.