What does sci think of Jordan "Bucko" Peterson?

He hates commies so he's a friend that fights for freedom.

how can a person comes to this, losing all emphaty
is there a real counterpart to this phenomenon, like actually losing function in your "mirror" neurons as a result of idk constantly high testosterone levels

wow
where's his altruism gene

>how can a person comes to this, losing all emphaty
killing communists is the empathic thing to do. by defeating them you save millions of lives.

>The sky's the limit. I am now starting to formalize my plans to bring accredited online humanities education to as many people as possible around the world. My colleagues and I (who include excellent engineers, programmers, financiers and educators) want to take the humanities back from the corrupt postmodernists, and offer education of the highest possible quality everywhere at 1/10 the price or less. We'll solve the accreditation problem as well, offering degree-equivalents with real psychometric value: best student in 10000; best in 1000; best in 100; best in 10; best in 5 (and no certification granted below that). We want to automate and crowdsource the problem of teaching people to write. We want to set up the courses so that (1) the content itself is constantly graded and improved and (2) the same goes for the accreditation process. We'll start with the humanities, including history, generating something approximately a four year liberal arts college degree, teaching people how to be responsible, literate, effective, powerful, confident citizens. We want to conduct real research into how people learn (and how they learn fast) and use the results of that research to make education better. It's high time for the humanities of the new millenium.

Can he save the humanities?

every person is a world

some world are worth more than others

either way he's fulfilled his evolutionary duty by having biological children. Your claim is irrelevant.

If you listen to him on the Waking up podcast he's actually a bit of a derp.

Hello, communist

Are you illiterate, or just misunderstanding? To claim some peoe are worth more is a capatilistic approach. The guy above him claiming "everyone is a world", now THAT'S communist

claiming that in every human being is a spark of the divinity is not communist but western individualism .

he's right wing fanatic trying to undo last 500 years of rational thought by pushing on everyone how much we're all supposedly programmed by religion and other pre-scientific-method-total-bullshit and that we should respect religion because it was around much longer that scientific method

pure bullshit

well said

>he's right wing
stopped reading there

lol you retard, ive listened to both 2017 classes : maps of meaning and personality and transformations so i actually fucking know what i'm talking about

in that case you are a brainlett. maybe on /b/ you can find your new home

To be fair Sam Harris was mostly playing semantic games with Peterson. I am a big fan of Sam Harris' podcast, but he really should have let that conversation move along instead of sperging out on Peterson.

LOL apparently you didn't listen very closely brainlet

ewwww you're disgusting user don't talk to me

nazi dubs confirm

>he's right wing
Please attempt to justify this statement I want a good laugh.

you all are brainlets. of course he wouldn't tell you upfront hes right wing fanatic, he's obviously hiding behind psychological stuff, even bullshit like dream interpretation, hurr durr how good freud maps to actual neurology! piaget would have taken into account neurosciences if he lived today! funnies part? talking about how you should use archetypes to shield yourself from propaganda! no you god damn retards, its called critical thinking, you dont need retarded bible stories for that AT ALL.

hurr durr essential narrative structures. its all fucking bullshit, you're the ones that dont see straight through his right wing brainwashing.

picrel: my results from test.mensa.no test which I've done earlier today you retards

you go impressive length, but still very weak bait. saw better on pol famalam

>claim he's right wing
>don't make a single mention of his politics to back it up
Hilarious, brainlet.

Very principled and motivational.

His scapegoating of postmodernism is a bit comical, but that's the only negative thing I can say about him.

Only right-wing faggots are obsessed with the concept of "free speech" in 2017.
Left-wingers and intelligent people have long moved on.

>His scapegoating of postmodernism is a bit comical

yeah thats not right wing at all you retards

>he's a right wing fanatic
>so what if he doesn't behave or argue like a right wing fanatic
>he must be a SECRET right wing fanatic

(You)

>Only right-wing faggots are obsessed with the concept of "free speech" in 2017.
holy shit this is comical

please continue

He sounds like Kermit. Also, I would argue that the identity politics crap has its roots in critical race theory, not the French "postmodernists" that are commonly derided.

Nice rebuke.

putin, kim jong-un and the saudis are all left wing for instance

Putin is a Russian nationalist/revanchist, NK is basically a racialist absolute monarchy (they formally renounced Marxism quite awhile ago), and KSA is not left-wing by any reasonable definition.

but that's wrong faggot

You sure showed me.

Killing commies is altruism.

i showed you you're wrong but you're too dumb to listen

>Nice rebuke.
>Chomsky is right-wing because he's a free speech advocate
>Bill Maher is right-wing because he's a free speech advocate
>Cenk Uygur is right-wing because he's a free speech advocate
>Dave Rubin is right-wing because he's a free speech advocate
>all the sane people who realize the importance of free speech are automatically right-wing!!
please keep going, these are the funniest posts I've seen all week

LOL at throwing Dave Rubin in there

everyone slightly to the right of you is a cryptoconservative when you're a communist

he is definitely the ultimate sqw though

but it's still fun watchign his patreon numbers go up

His hatred of postmodernism is vehement but doesn't make him right wing. He is more of a centrist than a right winger. I kind of agree with him on some of his opinions on postmodernism, like its rejection of absolute truth and its assertion of relativism.

the only person i dont mind giving 5$/month

He essentially is a cult leader now that /pol/ has made him the new Memeneux.

but molyneux is a philosopher, peterson's a psychologist

>Being this delusional
He really is a meme.

Right, /pol/ hates right wingers.

What inspired this thread, OP?
Was it youtube.com/watch?v=WI7_UAU4T9Q

Memeneux is a self-proclaimed philosopher. Peterson is much more of a philosopher than him. The kind of academic psych that Peterson is practicing is much more philosophy than science.

peterson is mainly a scientist and cultural critic. woudln't really call him a philosopher

humanities education that isn't infested with identity politics bullshit is exactly what's needed right now

e.g. Maps of Meaning is more a work of literary criticism than philosophy IMO

He's wrong to think that epistemological priority implies ontological priority

youtube.com/watch?v=0XxYwWg7F8I

Gee, an entire song dedicated to being a cuck, you sure showed us.

What did he mean by this?

What an idiot.

>Proof is impossible
>as godel proved

Really captivated my cashews

youtube.com/watch?v=kS7y4SIFnjw

king of brainlets

>oh wow he isnt smart at all

You're just trying to be different kid btfo

My gf and I enjoy listening to him, but hes overrated imo.

Im actually kind of surprised he gets away with calling out post-modernism. I mean, hes the one who doesnt believe in objective truth. Hes the one who psychologizes everything.

yeah, not a right-wing fanatic at all.

bloody idiots, even on Veeky Forums

>by defeating them you save millions of lives
Kind of like you nazis, right?

>saving many worlds by sacrificing a few

vs

>sparing a few worlds, thereby allowing many to perish

The trolley problem has pretty much been solved long ago and discussed to death, so all that remains is your own lack of moral fibre.

Ridding Europe of gypsies is such a bad thing

Mass murder is so cool! High five!

I oppose all kinds of authoritarians. but if I had to pick I would go with natsoc.

He has some very insightful lectures on social psychology.

its called being facetious you autistic fuck

Preventing crimes, homicides and squalor is cool.
Sitting idly and watching your homeland burn for the sake of the cult of human rights isn't.

Whatever helps you rationalize murder my man. Fuck the judiciary system, move straight to killing.

Imo he holds a form of sophisticated modernist interpretation out from which much of post modernism arose so it's easy to confuse the two. A lot of times when he explains something he goes into how that particular idea was bastardized and why it doesn't imply what pm claims.

The judiciary system whose sole concern is the comfort of the most heinous criminals in modern day Europe to the expense of law abiding citizens.

"I'm fucking stupid." or something along those lines.

This is so idiotic to such an uncanny degree it can only be justified by actual none memetic full blown autism.

The issue has fuck all to do with whether or not communism should be fought with lethal force. It has to do with one's capacity to empathize with individuals who've fallen prey to a malicious ideology given natural limitations of the human brain.

The fact that you not only lack said capacity, but also that of even understanding the issue itself reflects a legitimate pathology that warrants forced social isolation.

So let's not try and fix the judiciary system and just resort to murder? What a great civilization.

But that's what we're trying to do. Glad we agree.

Keep it up buddy, I'm sure you'll be a great murderer one day.

...

Cringe

...

>what is reading the whole sentence

>religious
>right wing fanatic
The first doesn't imply the second m8

>moral fibre
Ethics, not morals.

>The first doesn't imply the second m8
It does, all religious people are right wingers because they hate science.

His abuse of Godel is one of hte things I hate about him, and also the fact that he's a climate change denier.

I also hate how he thinks traditionalism has any value btw

test