ITT:Sites we hate

...

Other urls found in this thread:

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Left#Leftism
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antitheism
Veeky
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier#Lobbying_efforts_against_open_access
lesswrong.com/lw/p23/dragon_army_theory_charter_30min_read/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Veeky Forums.org

quads confirm

hail kek

nice get

Why do you hate it?

lesswrong.com

Huffington Post (Whiny Feminist/Commie Rage Rant)
Buzz Feed (Annoying Spam that people share on Social Media)
Tumblr blogs written by Feminists.
Most of Reddit.

They are blatantly biased and insufferably haughty about it

Just look at their appraisal of Antifa and then compare it to any article they have on right-wing groups

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action

They are not interested in being "rational"
They are interested in being leftist

www.elsevier.com/

Why the fuck do they even exist?

Why don't universities just release shit by putting it up on a PDF in their websites?

If you want credibility to be attached, then that will have to come from the name of the institution that released it.

I don't think you're wrong.

Are you an wizard?

I fucking hate I fucking love science.

Try researching how much control freemasonry has over the world's education systems. You may learn something if you're legitimately skeptical or curious

There was a cool thread about this over on /x/...

Great? What's wrong, too much of a textbook genius to consider something not coming off a corporate press?

>rationalwiki.org
>leftist
Good thing there's a clear consensus of what that meme means, right?

I really get the sense of pro-libtardism coming from this page

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Left#Leftism

why aren't these brain halves symmetrical reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Those websites ought to be disliked but you have no idea about what you are talking about and your reasoning is all fucked up.
>"I'm 17 years old and /b/ is the first community I interacted with IRL"
>Huff post
>tumblr blogs
>whiny fem commies
Maybe some superficial democrat feminism i and you are joking about the communism, because huff post is corporate media. I can 100% guarantee no real communist or feminist idealoges are allowed on huffpost. It's all indoctrinated English grads that are paid in cheerios or something.

>As per the usual for leftist groups, antifascist groups usually agree on very few things and there is no such thing as "national headquarters", and even local groups are often best understood as a coalition of disparate groups allied for a common goal or even a single demonstration that don't see eye to eye on other issues. Groups that are subsumed under the "Antifa" label can be as diverse as unreformed Stalinist tankies, green-leftist ecological activists in the vein of Greenpeace or hedonistic leftists who consider the former two buzzkills.
Not that I'd doubt that a website essentially founded on fedora-tier atheism would be left wing, but I think your own filter bias is just as strongly at play here.

breitbart and infowars

[citation needed]

>yfw it's 90% truth with 10% bullshit sprinkled in to discredit it

>infowars

Alex Jones is the greatest comedian this world will ever know.

thisssssssss

yeah they're at least smart enough to realize that the real versions are shit

alex jones is the most overrated crazy person on the internet

At least post shti that's even somewhat relevant to Veeky Forums you guys, e.g. LessWrong

It used to be good, but it has since then been taken over by SJWs.

checked

it was never good

Their article on 'antitheism' really drives home a million times over that they're fedora-tipping
ledditors more than anything.
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antitheism

...

not really considering his relationship with the president

>theism and religion are harmful to society and people
fucking retarded lol

haha yes i can reply with amazing maymay images related to this as well

Veeky Forums.org/rules#sci

...

good one

Admins say time ago "rational" was just a name,rationalwiki is anti Conservapedia

Why don't you like it? (Legitimately curious)

Truth

>Antitheism, also known pejoratively as "militant atheism" (despite having nothing to do with militancy) is the belief that theism and religion are harmful to society and people, and that even if theistic beliefs were true, they would be undesirable.

What part of that sentence is biased in any way? They define the term impartially and honestly; would you rather have them write 'dumb cucks who don't believe in our Savior'? And when was the last time you read about an atheist suicide-bombing his local church?

i just don't htink he's funny. there are funnier crazy people

reddit may be the single worst website for discussion of anything

>sites we are triggered by

reddit and 9gag

The utter, sad and unfortunate truth

It's like encyclopedia dramatica except somehow worse and more unfunny

Is it only sci related sites?

triggered

Any sane person would be triggered by the immense faggotry of that website.

Youtube.com

The real verisions you don't even understand? Irrational and uniformed meme boys like yourself make me all sticky

And that they care more about being snarky than being correct or comprehensive. So every article is just an unfixable circle-jerk of smugness masquerading as informational humor.

Downvote.

ED doesn't have the pretense of being intelligent. That's why they're more tolerable despite being more offensive.

io9

Fucking pop sci and sci fi trash written by uneducated high school dropouts who misunderstood pop sci news from other watered down websites.

Google.com

Glad I'm not the only one who exclusively uses Bing. Helps that I don't do anything other than look at porn.

THIS A MILLION FUCKING TIMES

NUKE ELSERVIER RIGHT NOW

MAKE IT TWO JUST IN CASE

I'm not familiar with elsevier, what do they do?

What's there to know?

>Scientists get funding through tax/industry
>Publish findings to Journal operated by Elsevier etc.,
>Scientists must pay for this privilege
>Other scientists perform peer review for free or nominal fees
>Scientists then give up copyrights to Elsevier when published
>Research is now hidden behind a paywall
>Government bodies, universities and industry end up paying millions of dollars to Elsevier for labour that Elsevier never paid for nor performed...
>Elsevier ends up with £2.320 billion Revenue per year

This is somehow how science was envisioned to operate

I forgot to include, Elsevier has actively tried stifle the open access movement.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier#Lobbying_efforts_against_open_access

They were also caught selling papers which should have been open access.

Thanks. Sounds like they're one of the main cogs in the machine that is killing scientific openness

THIS. FUCKING THIS. FUCK THEM.

so you are butthurt because they dont provide content that supports your political bias?

Clearly you are upset you feel that rationality has a left wing bias.

Why do you hate LW?

lesswrong.com/lw/p23/dragon_army_theory_charter_30min_read/

witnessed

Go back to /b/.

lmaooooooo XD

This thread was meant to be ironic
So why do you love those sites?

The sad thing is that it's required for most brainlets to function in society

Post some memetic hazards please

This post was meant to be ironic so why do you hate those sites?

I love them because they provide great information and are not just trash

>literally the guy on the right

Go fuck yourself newfag digits are digits
Also, checked

>the same trips again
holy dude my man
jesus is real
prase the sun
check'd

Read the rules.

none of the rules should be taken seriously

The rules mention only "DUBS"; trips and above are a different matter altogether.

quit being a bitch

wikipedia.org

I've never once heard of "Aquinia's First Mover principle" and i took 12 years of religion class at school (i'm in europe).
What is it about?

google it
its trash

They expose Miles Mathis very well, though.