/mg/ ∧ /math/ general

But physicists are solving problems in math now.
arxiv.org/abs/1608.03679
>math is too hard for mathematicians
>physics is too hard for physicists
What does this mean?

Didn't that paper get torn apart on stackexchange? I can't understand the fine details but it sounds like it was very overhyped/possibly contained some errors

math.stackexchange.com/questions/2211278/riemann-hypothesis-is-bender-brody-müller-hamiltonian-a-new-line-of-attack

>In conclusion, the sloppyness of the definitions used but the authors leads to a complete mess. Nothing is correct in this paper.

All simply a matter of finding a more suitable Hamiltonian. Transform a math problem into a physics problem and the physicists can make up their lack of rigor with what the mathematicians lack: intuition.

and people say math isn't practical....

Thank you, I extremely like your post. If you can tell more about topics connected to physics, I will be waiting for your stories. %%It's difficult, but I'm trying hard to understand it lol.%%

Thanks user. Posting here is a way for me to organize my thoughts on some interesting relationships and connections between things I've read. I'm glad people are enjoying them too.

Is this a joke? Have "people" not solved it yet?

Top kek

Looking for a recc for a subject to learn. It will be through self-study, so any texts would also be welcome.

I know the basics of algebra, analysis & topology, with a little more depth in commutative algebra and algebraic number theory.
(i.e. taken pretty much all the typical "undergrad" courses)

What should I check out next?
I'm taking an alg. geometry class next semester so I figure I may as well just wait to learn that.

Why are you making a duplicate thread?