Doesn't the theory of evolution basically btfo of communism?

Doesn't the theory of evolution basically btfo of communism?

pic unrelated

Yes. In the same way that cancers btfos capitalism.

Try starting by stating, why it should and then we can give you an answer.

Communism bitches itself out by actually being practiced.
Communism, much like Furries, is merely a fever dream for eccentrics and degenerates. Secretly, nobody actually believes Communism will work. They just want to degrade a current system enough so that they, in turn, can become a parasite off that system.

Nice statue shit discussion.

Communists are actually radical evolutionists - I don't think dialectical materialism (communist philosophy) says anything specifically about darwinian evolution, but it does talk about "composite systems emerging out of smaller systems and sharing their properties" or some other nonsense.

They also believed that communism wasn't a choice, but the "natural progression" of history, meaning that capitalism was so in contradiction with human nature, that communism must naturally emerge out of it: That is, Marx didn't believe we SHOULD be communists, but rather that history naturally WOULD LEAD to communism. It now seems that he was dead wrong, but there are still Marxist holdouts who await the global revolution like Christians await the second coming (that is, zealously and in vain)

His argument for this was roughly as follows: Man primarily defines himself and his life by his labor with which he produces his sibsistence and that which pleases him. Under capitalism, their labor is no longer for them, or even for someone else, but against them (laborers producing more effectively actually cheapen their own position, meaning the more you work, the more you enrich those above you, cheapen your own value, and finance your own oppression). He argued this was in such contradiction to human nature that communism necessarily followed.

So in short, Marxists are radical societal evolutionisys who believe in linear human progression towards perfection.

More in line with what you were actually implying, Evolution does not imply the "best" are the most successful, it implies the "best suited to their environment" are most successful. It says exactly nothing about wealth distribution, social organization, or economic policy.

You shouldn't use the word degenerate unless you are actually a Nazi

Not trying to criticize, but I think lots of people don't realize that that was nazi terminology that nazis revived to insert their ideology into the conversations of people who might not necessarily be nazis.

Not a Marxist by the way, I completely agree, it's a "fever dream"

Communists aren't Marxists.
'Communist' was never used until much later.
There are dozens of kinds of Socialism, Communism and Marxism. Classical Marxism (what you're talking about) isn't very popular at all, not even amongst Marxists.

>Classical Marxism (what you're talking about) isn't very popular at all, not even amongst Marxists.
Actually to elaborate, it was never popular amongst anyone. It just birthed derivatives.

Yeah thats not what biological evolution is at all. Not the same thing.

Actual communists, like the kind that ruled the USSR, where total blank slatists who didnt think biology had any role in human behavior.