Has this shit head done anything of real value? I literally anything else on him except he has a big iq. Why is everyone jerking him off?
Why this shithead famous?
Jason Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
Robert Moore
>Why this shithead famous?
because he has a high IQ
>Has this shit head done anything of real value?
no, but you can attempt to read his CTMU if you want, I've never seen anyone able to obtain anything of intellectual worth from it
> Why is everyone jerking him off?
who? normies have certainly never heard of him
Angel Morales
iq becomes less and less as the number increases
Christopher Perez
Are you trying to say it has diminishing returns?
Jacob Williams
No,less and less accurate.
Ryan Young
>Why this shithead famous?
Because he's a fraud.
>Has this shit head done anything of real value?
No.
Look at the board in one of his videos.
Looks like what an extremely naive person would expect to find in a genius' blackboard.
He's an utter ass.
Carter Barnes
>QUARKS?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>Down the shitter it goes.
Kayden Miller
Good read
teleologic.org
>The Third Option
>Determinacy and indeterminacy…at first glance, there seems to be no middle ground. Events are either causally connected or they are not, and if they are not, then the future would seem to be utterly independent of the past. Either we use causality to connect the dots and draw a coherent picture of time, or we settle for a random scattering of independent dots without spatial or temporal pattern and thus without meaning. At the risk of understatement, the philosophical effects of this assumed dichotomy have been corrosive in the extreme. No universe that exists or evolves strictly as a function of external determinacy, randomness or an alternation of the two can offer much in the way of meaning. Where freedom and volition are irrelevant, so is much of human experience and individuality.
>But there is another possibility after all: self-determinacy. Self-determinacy is like a circuitous boundary separating the poles of the above dichotomy…a reflexive and therefore closed boundary, the formation of which involves neither preexisting laws nor external structure. Thus, it is the type of causal attribution suitable for a perfectly self-contained system. Self-determinacy is a deep but subtle concept, owing largely to the fact that unlike either determinacy or randomness, it is a source of bona fide meaning. Where a system determines its own composition, properties and evolution independently of external laws or structures, it can determine its own meaning, and ensure by its self-configuration that its inhabitants are crucially implicated therein.
Sebastian Carter
I studied the CTMU for a few years, and all I could infer about Chris from it is:
he had a traumatic childhood, and was imbued with toxic shame, hence the need to prove himself a genius (he studied for IQ / mega society tests and initially took it under the name Eric Hart, and re-entered under his real name, an unethical act of fraud).
he claims his CTMU contains and is compatible with all faiths ("up to isomorphism" - his trademark cop-out)
makes a lot of leaps of logic, and if you don't agree with his train of thought it is because you're "not intelligent enough" (he funnily enough treats intelligence like a virtue). He'd rather be called Genius than Saint
He doesn't like the idea of God handing down his Word (he believes in God but avoids "religious dogma") so instead he created his own dogma by "reconstructing God/reality" from logic (not a perfect system either, mind you). Ignoring divine word to please reason is like he Jews who, the more firmly they seem to cling to the Old Testament, the more stubbornly they reject the New Testament
he naively appropriates concepts like Logos and throws in a technical term here or there to impress, like a charlatan
he's "building" his own "mega foundation center" (think scientological church and you get the whiff of demagogue-cult that emanates from him)
he couldn't get over his emotional problems to get a real job, out of pride and pig-headedness (is it me that should change or the world? nope, the world!). academic journals do accept non-PhD work provided it is of merit and passes peer review, but Chris thinks himself above any peer.
(cont)
Bentley Myers
(cont.)
CTMU--
He hasn't explained thoroughly- without hand-waving -how language maps from mind to reality, except by haphazardly saying science sits in his model, he gets lost in where mind applies formalism to understand nature by generalising it to "language", using odd neologisms like "syndiffeonesis" (an unoriginal reversal of the Laws of Thought, in fact that's all his holism is is reverse reductionism)
He claims it yields useful results but withholds from publishing them due to fears of plagiarism, he thinks it can bring about World Peace.
He copyrighted the CTMU, a so called logical model for all thoughts and contents of reality... so he's saying he copyrighted Reality (or God, Chris isn't clear on the difference) because his CTMU is perfectly isomorphic to it...
He does a good job explaining flaws in current models, but when he gets to a self-cancellative boundary for containment he doesn't point to where this might be observed. It works as a mathematical abstraction within the language of mathematics, but he generalises all languages into one so if it exists in math it must be everywhere (is he a formalist or intuitionist?)
His CTMU is one large language game that include language... in Chris' parlance a "metalanguage game", which is either a practical joke or a work of crankery ("geniuses are never appreciated in their time!" says Chris, angrily stomping about his ranch).
The CTMU is apparently based on tautologies which work within the framework of logic and language, and somehow because reality is linguistic and physical reality is a subset of whole reality it is beyond empirical proof so the framework of logic and language is enough for him to get by in defining reality as a whole.
It makes no sense to isolate certain features from reality, combine them into a larger abstraction, and then attempt to infer reality from abstraction.
It's an impossible situation to try to retrieve existence in general out of thought in general.