>That is a static dipole
it clearly shows magnetic field lines
magnetic field lines imply moving charges
Why do you say that OPs diagram depicts a static dipole?
What happened to this representation of the electric field?
Easton Myers
Dylan Butler
Because he's schizophrenic.
Hunter Rogers
What difference does it make?
The field isn't static either way.
Aiden Martin
OP said he was posting the electric field so I assumed the darker lines were lines of constant potential. See how one of the darker lines is labelled with phi? That usually indicates potential.
Jose Ross
>not static
What makes you say that?
uvm.edu
Nathan Long
equipotentials = lines show equal electrostatic force?
>mfw electrostatics are a bit different than EM
In OPs diagram the lines marked with phi are what I'm used to seeing as magnetic field lines, the lines marked with psi are electrostatic field lines.
but I guess that might be the difference between electrostatics and electrodynamics.
Easton Edwards
Somebody posted in on 4cahn, and it lost all credibility.
Anthony Lee
I think the field moves.
Jonathan Rogers
But what is potential?