I hypothesize things shouldn't exist, because one thing causes another, so what caused the first thing? The given answer is usually "the first thing came out of nothing", but how can something come out of nothing? It can't. So the conclusion is... the Universe shouldn't exist. Yet it does.
Why?
Ian Price
Gorilla user I respect your work but you really need to read a book or two before asking stupid questions.
Jack Sullivan
>one thing causes another prove it
>but how can something come out of nothing? It can't why?
>Yet it does. Does it?
>Why? That's the real of metaphysics, not physics. Go ask
Sebastian Wright
The tricky question is: Why is there something instead of nothing?
Asher Barnes
>prove it If I punch you in the face you'll cry like the faggot that you are. This is an example of causality. >why? Because if it's nothing then there isn't something to come out of it; if there is, then it isn't nothing. >Does it? Cogito ergo sum. >That's the real of metaphysics No, I am basically saying what said but in a slightly more elaborate way.
Adam Sanchez
define something define nothing
Xavier Cook
there is something because we are here to see it
Jace Stewart
Who are you to define what 'is' is? Are you God?
Easton White
One thing doesn't cause another because things exist.
Connor Bennett
We know that things DO exist because if they didn't we couldn't ask if they did or didn't. Descartes solved that and any objection or argument against this is not to be listened to. So now, we must ask "why did it happen, why do things exist?" The answer: God obviously, stop being a faggot.
Jaxson Perry
We're living in a simulation, mate.
Outside of this simulation we're living in maybe physics makes sense where something can come out of nothing.
Cooper Robinson
Everything just exists. It's just there. Always has been, and always will be (at least at a fundamental level).
Bentley Fisher
>how can something come out of nothing As mentioned - the only thing you can prove is your own existence (the only certain thing is one asking the questions), but the funny riddle may be...
sooner or later you will cease to exist and you didn't exist for quite a long time (eternity?), before you gained your consciousness. How and when did you become conscious?
Anthony Sanders
You cannot prove your existence because you haven't defined what existence means.
Mason Harris
I can define existence as "blahblahbladerpderpblah", doesn't matter (the definition is obviously wrong), in order to do the definition, defining subject needs to exist.
James Torres
>defining subject needs to exist. Why? Is there a law saying that a non-existence/existence duality cannot be possible? How do you prove that Exists and Does't Exist aren't the same, or that they are sometimes the same and sometimes not? Metaphysics aren't science, I hate threads like these.
Samuel Robinson
>Why? To ask the above question.
Caleb Butler
>2017 >still thinking this is clever
>Outside of this simulation we're living in maybe physics makes sense where something can come out of nothing. This is an interesting idea and I've considered it before, but I really can't fathom how it could be true even in theory.
Dominic Evans
>2017 >taking Bostrom's joke paper seriously.
Aaron Miller
no, the conclusion is that you don't start with nothing
Nicholas Sanders
I didn't say anything about Bostrom's paper, his argument is obviously flawed. But we could still be living in a simulation, and there are other possible ways in which there could be another physical reality outside of our own. But mainly the concept of a physics where it actually makes sense that everything came from nothing is just pretty interesting by itself.