Does the existence of very advanced math mean that it describes something in our physical universe that we are just...

Of course father of quanmeme would say that

The universe is an ever-growing and complexifying entity of entities, we are points of the system that have become complex to the point of being able to realize that we are something and that something is happening. You are the universe just as it is you, you as you find yourself is merely where this constant force has created a fractal of enough depth that it can become aware of being alive. Everything lives, it is just a matter of many 'things' make up a thing to how alive we see it, everything is acting and reacting in a motion in which everything is built on by everything. It's all, we're all, one big thing that is and does for the sake of it.

>But I'm aware that you're asking "does math imply god exists" and the answer is certainly no

Then tell me, why does 1+1 always have to equal 2? Why can't it be 3 sometimes?

What do you mean by "1" and "2" and "3" and "+" and "equal"?

1+1=2 because that's the way it fucking is. Why can't things just be the way they are? Why do the rules of our language have to be determined by the properties of some supernatural being? Why can't 1 + 1 = 2 because we have decided what 1 is, what + means, what = means, and what 2 is?
Keep in mind there's nothing stopping you from developing a written system of mathematics where 1+1=3. But perhaps you'd find that in your "new" system 3*3=4 and 3+1 = [math]\omega[/math] where [math]\omega[/math] is the integer between 3 and 4.
Stop being a fucking retard. Your imagined connection between the order of mathematics and the musings of a pandimensional superbeing are O'Reilly-tier. Mathematics is invented by mankind, period. The things mathematics usually describes, however, are a permanent feature of the universe.

Mathematics is not invented. It is a discovery of the objects which exist in reality beyond interpreted nature.

>objects which exist in reality beyond interpreted nature
Fuck off, Plato.

Even if your presupposition that extra-physical "objects" "exist" in some "reality" super-ordinate to the one we live in, mathematics as we experience it was invented, the same way that the words you're reading right now were invented. Mathematics is a tool by which we interpret nature, and these extra-real objects that you claim "exist" were created by humans for the explicit purpose of describing real objects, the way the word "cat" describes all cats, but there is no hypothetical ideal cat.

You are not talking about mathematics but the ymbols and notation used to encapsulate it. A number is not just a numeral. There things we create to describe objects but those things are not mathematics. They are the tools of the trade called logic.

The symbols and notations and syntax of mathematics ARE mathematics. There's nothing else to it. You can use different symbols and syntax but it will be the same mathematics, provided you use it to answer the same sorts of meta-mathematical questions like "what is the ratio between the diameter and circumference of a circle"?

Those are not the same if the axioms are replaced with theorems or the theorems replaced with axioms. The logic you model changes but the math is rediscovered not rebuilt. You are saying it right there its not changing. Thats because it wasnt something that was made to begin with. The algebra and geomtry behind questions is not math. Its the question themselves. That ratio is not just a numbe or numeral; its an object that goes beyond even the circle itself.