Yes, look at the black nobility and their fucking shit tier creations. The most unnatural selections ever possibly conceived. The entire fucking Pacific ocean is radioactive and going to be mush soon because of the fukushima incident and (((they))) defended and a few owned part of GE. GE makes those fucking reactors.
Is that proof enough humans should chill the fuck out and not be assholes of what OP?
Yes, the short answer is yes.
Nathaniel Robinson
The thought experiment is simple for this situation. Assume you have a species with no mutation rate and no variation, and is perfectly adapted for their environment (as such, will never be able to adapt through natural selection, as all members will have equal fitness). If the conditions of the world change slightly, the the environment will change slightly, and the species will become slightly less fit for it (and with no possible variation, will be unable to ever be any better for it). If these changes continue to occur, the species will become less and less fit, until it eventually becomes extinct. Therefore, a species that does have mutations, and so can respond to selective pressures, will always be dominant. By definition, a species that does not react to selection (through an inability to mutate) cannot become more fit for its environment, since the ability to mutate cannot evolve (and so the population will die out, making way for one that can mutate to take its place in the ecosystem's niche).
Wyatt Thomas
or* what
Daniel Roberts
That is not what I meant
Aaron Reyes
It's called common sense.
Samuel Cook
>experimental studies which prove L0Lno Lrn2science fgt pls
Jeremiah Butler
Can you show me experimental studies that prove common sense is both common and makes sense?
Connor Roberts
Whith the number of offsprings of insects, abd the associated death rate in stable population, selection can work at full rate. You don't even need many survivors.
Kevin Butler
There's also sexual selection in evolution. Birth control associated with monogamy may have strongly reduced it by making adultery related births less likely. But it may also help to select better mates by separating sex with reproduction, women don't breed children from those from they had only short term fun, except accidental pregnancies for birth control failure they choose to keep, long term relationship fathers are more likely to be selected
Camden Morales
And don't forget Darwin awards style selection it always works. Stupid trials like those in america tends to reduce these risks, but it would be a wise law to limit liability from risks associated with really stupid behavior. Limiting means used to protect those idiots