Anyone able to give me a good explanation as to how a living organism can be a model of its environment (or atleast...

anyone able to give me a good explanation as to how a living organism can be a model of its environment (or atleast sensory inputs) and why it has to be?

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18365164
goodregulatorproject.org/images/A_Primer_For_Conant_And_Ashby_s_Good-Regulator_Theorem.pdf
rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/86/20130475.
cbcl.mit.edu/cbcl/people/poggio/journals/bertero-poggio-IEEE-1988.pdf
math.nsc.ru/LBRT/u2/Survey paper.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28163801/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/18365164/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Well there's the good regulator theorem.

>how a living organism can be a model of its environment
wat? do you mean how brains learn a model of the environment? or are you talking about indicator species?

Thats not true, whos idea is that? It sounds dumb and i need it explained to me
anyways, you are looking for this
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18365164

dude, someone proved mathematically that a good regulator is a model of the system it regulates. goodregulatorproject.org/images/A_Primer_For_Conant_And_Ashby_s_Good-Regulator_Theorem.pdf . this explains it in easy terms. we can assume this applies to living organisms since they regulate their entropy (i.e. try not to die.)

i mean that for every state of an organisms ecological niche, the organism responds with a corresponding states so that for every environmental state there is a corresponding state in the organism (state when thinking in terms of statistical physics microscopic distributions). in simple terms you can say this means that an organism has a reaction (even if this means keeping still) that keeps the organism alive (puts an upper bound on its entropy)

note, a model is simply a mapping so that if you have two systems, every individual state of one system corresponds to a state in the other system. in a sense, modelling can be explained solely in terms of correlations. the ideal map has a one-to-one correlation. but you can say that a system goes toward a mapping if it reduces the entropy of its correspondence to the system that it maps (in informational terms though informational entropy is isomorphic to physical entropy mathematically)

>(External/Internal)state stress * heartrate and some chemical composition in matrix or equation form
...ok, maybe..

(for every situation it has a reaction)

huh?