Should we punch nazis?

Yes I do. Those who disagree with the ideals of the coming communist revolution should not be punched, they should be shot.

Use of force is justified as long as you're prepared to face retaliation. In other words, Spencer was in full rights to pull out a gun and shoot this cunt to death

>the guy who obviously is a Naz
Is he really, though?
I disagree with his beliefs, but that's all they are, just stupid things he believes. Does he go out hunting minorities or executing jews? or is that just something he talks about? And does simply talking about that make him a nazi?

And where do you draw the line?
Say there are two people who feel justified getting a punch in - is that okay?
What if there are ten? Well, I guess if he is still standing.
But what if he falls to the ground? Should we get a kick in? As long as it's not in the head?

See how quickly things get messy when trying to establish the proper amount of justice to be dispensed on someone?

Then the messiness snowballs as more people are allowed to decide.

It's best to stick to the principle of non-violence, because you can justify yourself your way to murder pretty quickly

>Has any book taught anything about it? Is there any moral lesson out there that you're willing to share? Any philosophical insight?
Are you having a fucking laugh? You seriously think this qualifies it without breaking the rules? Saged

Is racism, a drive for a white ethnostate and simpathies for actual nazism just a matter of opinions? Is seeing certain people as literally subhuman a 50/50 problem?

I don't think so. Now, i wouldn't advocate for punching Spencer if he was just another guy going on with his life. But he is a political organizer instead. He is trying to organize a political movement, and its foundation are just horrorific, inhuman and should find no place in society.
He deserves to be punched, since him being succesful in politics means that our democracy is ruined forever.

Yeh yeh so you're so edgy

No

Commie scum should be hung from trees though

It's not about whether we should or shouldn't, it's just that punching nazis is a symptom that the nazis are not as irrelevant as they should be. This makes them more proud of themselves and provides a relief for those who are against them. A relief that is temporary and not at all substantial and therefore can help conceal their real harm. There is an underlying thought of "look, nazis are ridiculed and getting punched, we don't have to worry about them right now".

There is no question that punching a nazi can be a thrilling experience for anyone anti-nazi, but if we were to repress this sensation a bit more we can see it come up a little more fiercily when it needs to be. The real question is why interview them at all, why give them press or voice at all. We should not ignore them, we should just realize there is nothing of value to even be ignored... and then ignore them.

That's the thing that gets me. SJW Liberals constantly spout that freedom of speech isn't really freedom of speech unless there's consequences. OK sure -- but freedom of speech is really just about protecting out rights to politically talk in public without legal discourse. It by no means justifies the reactionary violence that is in this video clip.

It's pretty childish imho to react this way. No matter what toxic someone spews, at the end of the day it's just words. And guess what, liberals seem to forget that they have the power of words -- and in this day and age, they should have cognitive ability to make some argument against this, instead of opting for straight out violence.

Kind of silly, really.