how does sci feel about facts
How does sci feel about facts
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>zerohedge
are you implying that Tyler Durden is not a reputable journalist?
...
...
>166 years
>Less than 1.5° change
I'm not concerned.
Facts are a spectrum.
its not even that much
It doesn't fit the narrative so it's bullshit. Move on.
nice chart too bad it proves nothing..
OMG they even use his pic. That's too good.
Literally every sentence in that image is a lie. Pathetic.
I feel that anybody who isnt genuinely mentally retarded should know that science is comprised of the collection of all attempts at researching a study. an outlier conclusion doesnt negate general consensus. neither does a few grand from the Koch brothers.
i prefer them to lies
it isn't linear doofus
in both cases, do you see how fucking insane 2016 was? not to mention the fact that 2017 is not yet over (we've gone through 5 typically cold months of worth of records and 1.5 months of hotter weather) which would logically result in a lower calculated mean than the full set would yield. still rather concerning in both cases
This is not an outlier conclusion, it's a pseudoscientific blog post pretending to be a legitimate research paper which was created solely for the purpose of being shared by other fringe blogs and misinforming the masses for political purposes. It's incredibly scummy.
youtube.com
Don't mind this P H FUCKING D IN CLIMATOREDPILLS BTFOing CLIMATEDENIER DENIERS.
Facts are a three-dimensional space
I don't think you guys know how that site works
>starting at 1997
>Heartland Institute
Are you a PhD? Go back to posting images as replies, while he continues ARGUING and showing EVIDENCE.