Why do all women "philosophers" think the exact same way?

Why do all women "philosophers" think the exact same way?

>Teeheehee, silly little boys with their love of minutiae and macho attitudes destroying the potential for collaboration!

Upvote this post if you hate women.

>implying Simone Weil thinks the same as Ayn Rand

They always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future.

I really, really hate women.

This.

Simone Weil, Flannery O'Connor, Edith Stein are all great writers/philosophers on par with any man.

American/ analytic philosophers are all banal liberal shills

Being physically weaker, women are more obliged to cooperate with a group in order to access resources, find safety, etc. This eternal necessity of increased conformity relative to men entails both a higher degree of group-think, as well as an overall higher degree of "average-ness".

In each case, there are more male than female blithering retards, and super-geniuses. In terms of intelligence, for example, women hew more closely to the mean. Of course, there are always outliers, but there are even fewer of them in the case of women.

So if the OP notices an increased degree of conformity in the thought of women, then the above should partially explain why that is.

Congratulations, you've supplied three (3) purportedly exceptional data points.

>Congratulations, you've supplied three (3) purportedly exceptional data points
>Why do all women
>all

Guess the hypothesizer shouldn't have written 'all'.

Theory Falsified