Applied Mathematics vs. Pure Mathematics
who would win in a bar fight?
Applied Mathematics vs. Pure Mathematics
Charles Watson
Evan Robinson
doesn't matter. distinction between the two is mostly unimportant
Charles Scott
that sounds kinda dumb considering most if not all software utilizes applied mathematics in a myriad of fields.
Dominic Sullivan
Applied is just pure with ways around the hiccups
Landon Fisher
what I thought pure vs applied math was:
math with proofs Vs math without proofs
what it actually is:
autistic inconsistent math Vs clueless but functional mutt math, both without sufficient proofs
what I thought happened:
pure math came first, applied math came after
what actually happened:
applied math came first, pure math only recently became something apart from science, and its quality suffered greatly since then
what I expected pure mathematicians to be:
greatest philosophy kings on the planet, great teachers with a great grip on reality
what I found out about pure mathematicians:
overspecialized drug fueled academia bureaucrat schizos without any great general intelligence
what I expected applied mathematicians to be:
superengineers, able to use all the knowledge they have spent years learning in academia for the benefit of society
what I got:
horny memers, they have learned to imitate math processes but are actually horrible at problem solving because they thought they could memorize their way into the moon without any serious individual logic
Between the two fucking retards, who I love and respect by the way, applied math wins because they want to be useful.
Evan Gutierrez
I do adderall.
Zachary Brown
>who would win in a bar fight?
Applied mathematicians tend to truncate decimals. There's no bar notation to be found. So pure maths wins by default.
Adrian Gray
so what you're saying is you should've gone physics
Aiden Williams
Its basically Grothendieck vs Von neumann
Jordan James
The Pure Grothendieck vs Applied Von Neumann.
Both have huge brains / heads.