How does he compare to guys like Einstein and Hawking? Also, do we know if his "M-theory" works?
How big a deal is this guy?
Samuel Howard
Other urls found in this thread:
James Davis
>Also, do we know if his "M-theory" works?
have you ever seen a string?
me neither
Blake Barnes
what a phenotype I crave for it
Nathan White
M-Theory doesn't have strings.
Nicholas Baker
>hawking
>smart
pick1
Robert Bennett
Who are you quoting?
Austin Price
>M-Theory doesn't have strings.
Physics noob here, can you elaborate on this? First sentence of en.wikipedia.org
Aiden Smith
BIG
Grayson Smith
ASHKENAZI
Josiah Cruz
He's a far better physicist than hawking and, for what it's worth, has more citations than einstein (about 1.8 times). Many consider him in the same league as einstein and newton, though it should be mentioned that because much of his work is in string theory it remains to be seen whether this specific work will ever pan out, if it does you can bet he'll go down as one of the top 3 physicists to ever live. If it doesn't he'll still be considered easily one of the greatest of the 20th century, and possibly one of the top 10 of all time, maybe top 20. (many people forget that he's actually done a hell of a lot of work outside of string theory all of which is of the highest caliber)