Scientism's Downfall

>large parts of it are based on speculation
>sloppy science
>assumptions
>huge parts of the theory that have yet to be shown
>can't explain all of the transformations of life
elaborate on all of these

>What's a Hume's guillotine? The article
Sometimes the mediocre reasoning skills of creationists are overwhelming

daily reminder that darwinian evolutionary theory was a product of post-french revolution positivist interpretations of history where the concept and field of history was being divorced from its judeo-christian roots

buncha outdated historicist bullshit if you ask me

>creationists
Nice meme, atheist

Fruitflies.

And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

>trying to use Scripture to prove your monkey ideology

>The Bible
Yeah, no.
Even if that WAS the word of it.
Even by Christian acknowledgement it has been reorganised and rewritten countless times.
Which means, like Chinese whispers.
It would barely, if at all, by the words of God.
But rather, the words of human corruption.
So, that's discarded.
Anything else?

And what I meant was, is that we can observe evolution in fruitflies, far more rapidly than in most other animals.

>discarding the words of the Almighty

If we go by that logic, cleft palettes and down syndrome is "evolution" as well. All mutations are harmful, and take away from His design.

Ok then, everyone, if you think evolution is not real, explain me the existense of the riboenzymes (hint: They are RNA catalysts)

Why I ask? Enzymes catalyse most reactions in our body.
DNA transcripts to RNA which translates to proteins.