> The Syracuse problem is not a problem
Hurr durr if I map infinity onto stuff I can prove that you know nothing, checkmate atheists
True enough user. But, what you're claiming is that because we live in a finite world, it is stupid to assume that there COULD be an infinite amount of axioms? But doesn't also just say that Godel was wrong? Unless you count all possible primes part of the physical world.
So numbers exist in the physical world now?
you need to have passed high school to post here friend
I think you haven't considered the problem of what the ontology of numbers is. There's no obvious answer to whether or not numbers exist in the physical world.
Das ist kein Argument.
can't argue on a triple digit iq discussion with a two digit iq pleb
You're not helping your cause. It seems like you have no arguments to give.
i never had the intent. ta ta.
Class, here is a textbook case of the Dunning–Kruger effect.