Can the brainlets of Veeky Forums even get this one right?
Can the brainlets of Veeky Forums even get this one right?
4.
5 including the signature
19 faggot
there are like 20, wtf are you saying 4?
triangles dont have lines going through them brainlet
6 per row, so 24?
Mfw a triangle has 4 sides
I count:
1 (big one),
3 (the other three with bases parallel to the base of the origianl big one, spanning the other two legs),
12 (the "narrow" ones, taking each sector one-at-a-time as it were),
8 (the "middle" ones, taking each sector two-at-a-time as it were),
So I definitely get at least 1 + 3 + 12 + 8 =24 triangles.
Now tell me, did I miss any?
I only count 10
24
This.
Anyone says otherwise they are pleb brainlet faggots.
They are as many as the ones in the red area, times 4.
In the red area there are 3+2+1=6.
Therefore there are 24 in total.
I count 24. What do I win?
>people think 4 or 24 are the right answer
Fucking kek
It's a single triangle, you can't have more than one just because there's more inside of it
Finish high school before you post on Veeky Forums pls.
24
Psh, nothing personnel kid
*teleports behind your triangles*
Its 25. Theres a triangle in that one scribble/text
We should settle this by asking /mg/ how to define a triangle.
There aren't any triangles, it's all just squares
Next level shitposting right there, buddy
Have an upvote
0, it's a perspective drawing.
3.4+3.4=24
7.
28
i count 27
shit, I meant 31^2
26. You missed one.
but it's plural, so there could be an infinite number of triangles.
possible to abstract 24 different triangles from this graph
correct
brainlet
Triangles isn't a triangle, only the Triangle within Triangles is a triangle.
Are you fucking for real? A TRIANGLE has 3 (THREE) sides. The drawing itself is a triangle. If you're going to go and add that to the 3 things om top with three sides (triangles) you get 4. Signature bullshit and another one. Stuff with 4 sides isn't a triangle idiots.
>posts vague question
The only reason this question is hard is because it's so unspecific.
This is actually standard exam question in third world.
None. Proof:
Halving the "triangle" results in square and lesser "triangle".
Halve it infinite number of times.
You end up With infinite number of squares and "triangle" with no area=point
You can't create a triangle with rectangles.
Triangles does not exist.
QED
24
28. I'm offended by this board's stupidity.
Most of you desperately need eliminating.
wrong.
If a similar triangle has n horizontal lines and m vertical lines then we have n*(m-1)*m / 2 triangles.
In OP's example n=4 and m=4 so # of triangles = 4*3*4 = 24.
21
Are u stupid? There is no upvote on Veeky Forums.
33 damn you guys are stupid
>28
>can't prove it
See: Pic related
show me where you got an extra 9. i'll wait.
You can take the first 3 triangles you draw to make one triangle.
You can do this to form other triangles you forgot.
that would form 28 but i agree. man i can't believe i forgot about that one.
The triangles forgot would take up the spots of the accidental repeats he included in his set of pictures.
>mfw i just noticed the repeats
just fmsu
I think he just fucked up in the editing process. The answer is 24, there are 24 images there but he forgot some combinations. Plus, he added the same triangle more than one time.
infinite.
open your mind.
is this b8
issa gif solution
3, the rest are bisected and don't count. The "4th" one is also bisected.
This is wildly incorrect.
For these types of problems the bisected ones count afaik.
We're not counting the bisections, though. Just the three sides of each triangle.
I count 21