What's Veeky Forums's opinion on eugentics? Is it right or wrong? Make sure to back up your opinions with proof

What's Veeky Forums's opinion on eugentics? Is it right or wrong? Make sure to back up your opinions with proof.

Other urls found in this thread:

wired.com/2012/05/tomato-chemistry/
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/04/AR2005080402194.html
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/false-cause
archive.is/QAlD2
archive.is/26hMm
t5forums.com/forum/the-vs-sections/general-discussion/respect-threads/48059-joseph-newton-respect-thread
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982203002902
aeon.co/essays/on-epigenetics-we-need-both-darwin-s-and-lamarck-s-theories
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Not science

wrong. no proof. it's just wrong, inherently, to tell people who they can and cannot breed with. my proof is simple, "would you want to be told you cannot breed"?

Why is it not science?

Got any sources for that?

Because you cannot "prove" an opinion.

Well you should at least have a basis to back up your opinion

my source is your answer to the question "would you want to be told you cannot breed based on your genetics"

There is absolutely nothing that Eugenics can accomplish which genetic engineering will not later make completely irrelevant. Eugenics will create societal upheaval for absolutely no purpose.

It used to be considered a science back in the day. It is outdated as a science. Now it is simply:

>Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims...

Beliefs and practices.
So