Is this chart reliable?
Author Ranking
Jaxon Howard
Colton Murphy
only thing reliable about this chart is that the creator had his head so far up his ass he was marveling at his tonsils
Justin Morgan
>Attempting to systematize artistic merit
top kek, mate.
Cooper Sanchez
A lack of accessibility isn't artistic merit
Hudson Clark
Why is Woolf under 4?
Mason Phillips
What does this chart have to do with accessibility? Are you really about to make an argument for why a chart originating from a deep web meme stock image somehow provides accessibility on a board like 89% dedicated to tossing around titles of books that are probably worth your while (not to mention the fucking hoard of charts already devised and available if you have the most cursory knowledge of this board)? I just really hope you're bored and not actually prepared to do this.
Blake Baker
It says at the top of the image that it's a 'book accessibility chart'
Kayden King
>labels define content
Wew, boy I guess you haven't heard of memes.
Jaxson Wilson
Seems pretty clear that is what the image is going for based on the descriptions of the different levels. I'd have a better chance of arguing the image is about accessibility than artistic merit based on the evidence
Samuel Barnes
Talk about good faith. Jesus, buddy, do you have a mind to what critical thinking is? You invoke the "descriptions" as if what a text intends is always what it achieves. And lbr you're just fetishizing a term you pulled out of your ass in defense of your shitty post rather than actually thinking about what any of comments have meant. There's no way you can actually be this fucking stupid.