Serious Question

Serious Question,

Why do the vast majority of intelligent people/introverts/etc have a harder time with dating/talking to the opposite sex?

While most normies are always in relationships and make dating look easy?

Isn't this paradoxical? Should intelligent people have an easier time getting laid/dating?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=a-GqSWsISVs
youtube.com/watch?v=t2hfFOXhXmM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because the average girl is dumb as a box of rocks, boring, and doesn't care about anything beyond the newest Rihanna album.

This.
After a while it gets boring for someone intelligent to be around someone stupid, who cannot discuss abstract themes.

I find all of my classmates boring unless they're into video-games or science and math.

That's HS in a nutshell if you are introverted, you either have that one very good friend or none at all IMO. UNI is where people think like you, or its at least better then HS.

Smart people overthink things.

Dumb people can think about sex and obtaining sex without many other considerations.

Its all about looking good and first impressions more than intelligence.

It is regrettable that those with the best genes - the ones of intelligence - are usually excluded from society's gene pool. There are two reasons for this, the very simple, the simple and the one that will blow your mind.

The very simple reason is you can't think about math, you can't read the classics, you can't learn science, when you're doing drugs and having orgies all the time.

The simple reason to understand is the biological relation between offspring and intelligence. See, living beings like bugs lay thousands of eggs, fish lay hundreds, cats and dogs have 5 individual offsprings, niggers have 4, whites and asians have 2 or 1, and so the most intelligent, evolved and superior of all naturally have no children.

The one that will blow your mind is that intelligent people do not need to reproduce because they can pass on information through means other than DNA. See, all living beings pass on information - even after they die -. They do so, usually, with DNA. The thing with DNA is that it's within a cell, it's information that exists within the living being. Humans, however, differ from animals in that they can pass some information without DNA, and thus, beyond their own inner mechanisms. Humans do this by, for example, writing books, playing music or engineering technologies. We can use the environment to pass on information. And that's why the phenomenon of smart ones like monks and scientists being socially excluded is so common. They don't have a biological necessity to breed, to have kids, to pass on their DNA, when they can pass on information by means like active research, publishing an article or writing a book.

This is why the greatest humans of all - Jesus, Buddha, Newton, Tesla, Beethoven, etc - are all virgins.

Is there a correlation between intelligence and social skills ? There shouldn't, bu i feel like there is.

G-girls don't like math silly user.

>what're you majoring in?
>I'm a bio/primary ed/psychology/physical fitness/some other dumb degree major!:^)