Why Don't Engineers Learn Proofs?

The proof of an engineer's work is the physical object they make.

Engineers learn to make the best proofs of all.

Not all of us are students.

>mathfags still don't have a way to solve Navier Stokes
Why do mathfags SUCK so much DICK? They can't even figure out a basic numerical solution because it doesn't rely on MUH PROOFS. Engineers have been doing this stuff for over half a century while mathfags everywhere still scratch their BALD and BETA heads.

No, that bullshit's not required for thew degree.

>6-8 courses
Fucking what? I call bullshit that's often the case.

Dude it's not, talk to anyone who's doing an engineering degree or has done one.
I agree on the basis that they only teach you how to be a robot.

I made a wizard version

>tfw I met people like this before

On the rare occasions when engineers need proofs, we google them!

Use the book as a ruler.

Every time i see a thread about how engineers dont dive so deep into math I say to my self that Veeky Forums is full of autistic spas who get hard from solving equations
on the other hand is right
7 out of 10 fellow students are the
>C's GeT DeGReeS BRuH

So its fair to say we all have our flaws

To your question OP, why should I waste time on a proof when I know that it works
why should I understand why it works when I only have to apply it.

I mean you use a pc right in that moment, does that mean you have to study CS ?