Damn...looks like I gotta lotta reading to do

Damn...looks like I gotta lotta reading to do...

Other urls found in this thread:

brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/economist_perspective_student_loans_dynarski.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

/pol/ shitposting aside, is it fair to call A Brave New World fascist?

I mean, if you like that sort of thing it's a pretty complete list

>"sold out"
>implying they didn't burn them

A Wrinkle in Time was anti-communist though

more like a piece of trash

>antifa
>signet classics

So was animal farm and we. I don't think you understand what those books are anti of

Please enroll in our movement to overthrow the system, the note.

Pretty good list though, tbrqhfa.ms.mh

No

>open protests and media criticism of Trump
>GUYS THIS IS LITERALLY FASCISM
Fucking sheep, normies would believe anything if the heads on the TV told them to. Even fascism. Ironically, if push comes to shove, the average person will fall in line and the /pol/ types will fight.

There's at least two copies sitting right next to the note idiot.

>implying /pol/tards aren't some of the most braindead sheep around.

I fucking spit on Margaret Atwood. Absolute trash.

None of these are particularly antifascist, in fact animal farm is specifically anti-stalinist

The one by Sinclair Lewis is the only one that's antifascist

The rest are high school garbage or irrelevant

>anti fascist

I'm getting pretty tired of this. Just because fascism was associated with nazism doesn't mean it's a bad government.

Pretty ideal on some levels.

Okay so if I saw that note this is exactly what I would do. First I would take a picture of it on my phone, which is an iPhone SE - Android sucks ass. Then, I would go to the front desk where the cash register is and ask them if I could please speak to the person(s) who created this list? As I asked this I would be showing them the picture I took. If they refused I would request to speak to the manager, and if the manager refused I would threaten to call corporate right then and there.

Anyway, once the people who created that list were in front of me, I'd then ask them a few simple questions:

>What is the definition of fascism?
>In what ways are President Donald Trump more fascist than Hillary Clinton?
>Why the fuck do you think anyone would want book suggestions from a minimum wage receiving, pseudo-intellectual being, community college attending, dumb-ass liberal bitch like you?
>What is your Tumblr?

Of course, the bitch would be at a loss for words. That, or would start yelling, because that's really the only thing liberals know how to do when faced with facts, logic, and reason.

I would then chuckle condescendingly, walk back to the list, rip it off what it's stuck to, walk back to the bitches that wrote it, and proceed to tear it up dramatially in front of them. Then I'd walk out of that store basking in the glory of my victory, and feeling smug (I'll admit to that) about knowing how hard I destroyed her in an argument, although a few minutes later I'd regret not getting her number because she was kind of cute and I don't have a girlfriend, but then I'd go home and masturbate and no longer give a fuck.

>>What is the definition of fascism?
An authoritarian nationalist government that requires strict adherence to a single ideology.
>>In what ways are President Donald Trump more fascist than Hillary Clinton?
In that Trump within three weeks has singled out minority groups and insist that any negative press he receives is fake and should be ignored while propagating myth and fiction to appear functional.
>>Why the fuck do you think anyone would want book suggestions from a minimum wage receiving, pseudo-intellectual being, community college attending, dumb-ass liberal bitch like you?
Because people are reatraded, can rarely figure anything out by themselves and often want others to do the work for them no matter how qualified they might be. See the current President.
>>What is your Tumblr?
Don't have one.

Gee you really got them their user.

REDPILLED

AS

FUCK

God bless you. I wish I could shitpost on this level.

>Selling the Signet edition of 1984 and not the edition with a foreword by Pynchon

>tfw the Trump presidency has been comfy for you so far because you live in a hick town and fit in with the locals.
I don't like muslims desu.

Is this Employee Pick thing a common thing in bookstores? Just saw it for the first time the other day.

By your definition China is fascist, every single country in the world pre-1945 would be fascist. It's a fucking awful definition.

Much better is the concept of ultranationalist palingenesis.

gtfo you disgusting whore

>An authoritarian nationalist government that requires strict adherence to a single ideology.
Not specific enough. Your definition is way too broad and could be used to define a whole number of ideologies, including Hillary Clinton's. Certainly, it doesn't very closely fit Trump's ideology (if he even has one ideology). Please, try again.

>In that Trump within three weeks has singled out minority groups
Wrong. He singled out countries that Obama himself singled out. And did not single out many countries that also have those minority groups as a majority within that country.

>and insist that any negative press he receives is fake
Much of it is, and he's simply giving it right back to the people who coined the term "fake news" (and used it to demonize non-establishment news sources) in the first place

>Because people are reatraded, can rarely figure anything out by themselves and often want others to do the work for them no matter how qualified they might be. See the current President.
The current President is far more qualified than his competitor was. In addition, he campaigned on policies that will enable people to work and be self sufficient, whereas his competitor campaigned on policies that would enable people to sit on their ass and get free handouts paid for those fortunate enough to have jobs (or be rich).

Nice try but no cigar, you would have embarrassed yourself less if you just said nothing.

V for vendetta was not anti fascist. Adam Susan did nothing wrong

He looks like a cunt

>Trump isn't authoritarian
y i k e s

even as a conservative you should be worried about the fact that he promised to jail political rivals and contest elections that he lost.

>mfw Trump will lose in 4 or 8 years time and refuse to leave office

>What is the definition of fascism?
non-minorities in positions of power
>In what ways are President Donald Trump more fascist than Hillary Clinton?
read my first answer
>Why the fuck do you think anyone would want book suggestions from a minimum wage receiving, pseudo-intellectual being, community college attending, dumb-ass liberal bitch like you?
cause i'm well read?
>What is your Tumblr?
not gonna post it here

I won’t be silent. I will speak out. And I WILL persist. FUCK. YOU.

China isn't fascist. It's national socialist.

So is Zionist israel

>>In what ways are President Donald Trump more fascist than Hillary Clinton?
>read my first answer

There are more women than men in America, so Trump would be the minority here.

>tfw the CIA contacts you because you kept posting "fuck Drumpf, fuck white people" on a Mongolian Throat Singing Forum
It was ironic you fucks.

>he promised to jail political rivals
False.

>and contest elections that he lost
You mean like Al Gore literally did? And Hillary Clinton literally did (after acting "appalled" that Donald wouldn't 100% commit to accepting the results of the election, would would be stupid to commit to for a variety of reasons)?

>even as a conservative
Fuck off with your concern trolling.

pls be my gf

Have you forgotten the fact that I don't like him???!!!

LOCK
HER
UP

This wasn't a promise, it was a rallying cry, and he was saying this as a citizen, not as President.

Son, let me give you a little tip and life lesson. I don't mean to embarrass you; it's nothing personal. We all learn it eventually, although you're learning it a little later than most. But here it is: generally speaking, when someone annihilates you in an argument, and you have absolutely no valid counterargument and can't prove them wrong, it is highly advisable that instead of opening your mouth and confirming to everyone that you are extremely frustrated by that fact, you keep your mouth shut and accept defeat with grace like an adult. Everyone will still suspect that deep down you're seething, and that your blood is boiling, but at least you yourself won't be confirming it to the world - an embarrassing situation for all. You seem like an otherwise decent young man, so I truly hope this helps you going forward in your life. Best of luck.

If you're anti-Trump you deserve to be locked up, my man. Probably some degenerate liberal with $10,000 worth of debt for your useless liberal arts major in college that somehow is still able to provide you with a superiority complex. I'd put you under sharia law myself if I could.

I wish I had $10,000 worth of debt

Holy fuck

>9080972

>being on the wrong side of history
um, try again sweetie

You don't know me cunt, stop replying to my posts

>thinks $10,000 is a big student debt

Wanna know how we know you haven't been to college, Cletus?

Clinton is a literal child trafficker.

Veeky Forums belongs to /pol/ now. Get the fuck out you commie retards.

brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/economist_perspective_student_loans_dynarski.pdf

>69% of undergraduate borrowers borrowed less than $10,000 in total and 85% less than $20,000.
He's right on the money though

>mfw drowning in leftwing pussy
Stay salty conservacucks

>left/right dichotomy

Cuck alert.

this 2bh

>mfw drowning in leftwing pussy ripe for a good hatefucking
Stay salty libcucks

What the fuck man. When someone types this much shit out about being buttblasted this causes some concern about YOU YOURSELF BEING BUTTBLASTED YOU MORON.

Literally the most anally ravaged person on the planet, and before you ask, no, my jimmies are not rustled, but it is pretty amusing when someone wants to feel superior to other people for ''''''''''''''winning'''''''''''''' and internet argument.

this

Son, let me give you a little tip and life lesson. I don't mean to embarrass you; it's nothing personal. We all learn it eventually, although you're learning it a little later than most. But here it is: generally speaking, when someone annihilates you in an argument, and you have absolutely no valid counterargument and can't prove them wrong, it is highly advisable that instead of opening your mouth and confirming to everyone that you are extremely frustrated by that fact, you keep your mouth shut and accept defeat with grace like an adult. Everyone will still suspect that deep down you're seething, and that your blood is boiling, but at least you yourself won't be confirming it to the world - an embarrassing situation for all. You seem like an otherwise decent young man, so I truly hope this helps you going forward in your life. Best of luck.

Someone make this image with the Bogdanovs on the far left, behind the reptilian

/pol/ is just looking at the masses with their eyes glued to a 50 foot television, saying "I'm smarter than these sheeple!" and then gluing your eyes to a small, shittier and less reputed television

>mfw drowning in leftwing pussy because i'm an apolitical chad with a big cock
stay salty ideologicucks

Son, let me give you a little tip and life lesson. I don't mean to embarrass you; it's nothing personal. We all learn it eventually, although you're learning it a little later than most. But here it is: generally speaking, when someone annihilates you in an argument, and you have absolutely no valid counterargument and can't prove them wrong, it is highly advisable that instead of opening your mouth and confirming to everyone that you are extremely frustrated by that fact, you keep your mouth shut and accept defeat with grace like an adult. Everyone will still suspect that deep down you're seething, and that your blood is boiling, but at least you yourself won't be confirming it to the world - an embarrassing situation for all. You seem like an otherwise decent young man, so I truly hope this helps you going forward in your life. Best of luck.

No.
The entire focus of the novel is on how the masses willingly turn to drugs and hedonistic lifestyles at the expense of individuality and the genuine struggles/emotions of being human. Basically Nietzsche's worst nightmare.
There is relatively little focus on the government's role, as the main focus is on how society has developed. It's clear that these are not oppressed people forced into the collective by the state, but rather social expectations have made their lives this way.

>>>What is the definition of fascism?
>An authoritarian nationalist government that requires strict adherence to a single ideology.
>>>In what ways are President Donald Trump more fascist than Hillary Clinton?
>In that Trump within three weeks has singled out minority groups and insist that any negative press he receives is fake and should be ignored while propagating myth and fiction to appear functional.
How can you answer these two questions without realizing that they're at odds? Did you even read what you wrote?
I'm not a /pol/tard by any means (I felt the Johnson), but you sure are retarded.

>Not specific enough.
Take it up with Webster then. It's a general term for a reason not meant to be applied to specific governments but to identify trends within said governments. It is unspecific on purpose because it incorporates two specific forms of governing within it. Namely authoritarian and nationalist.

>Wrong.

Not wrong. The Obama Administrations singled those countries for additional measures of scrutiny however they were never denied full access and the add scrutiny lifted once its job was complete. Where as the Trump administrations has instigated a full on ban that he, and his advisors have referred to as a "Muslim Ban". Not just added questions or a deeper background check but a full fledged stop to anyone from those countries coming over.

He's also in turn made it harder for CIA agents to compile information since now any would be terrorist isn't moving and has gone under ground. Never mind that to date the majority of terrorist activity in the US is from people born and raised in the country who come in contact with terrorist cells via the internet and not flying over the FuckWhoCaresistan.

>Much of it is

Much of it isn't. His crowd size was smaller. His press secretary today labeled any criticism of Ivanka as an attack on the presidency. He refuses to acknowledge any columnist who criticizes him and frequently resorts to made up situations to push an agenda.

> he campaigned on policies that will enable people to work and be self sufficient

By promising to bring back what amounts to 3% of the US GDP. Congrats you revitalized an aspect of the US economy no one except they people working in the factories cares about. What's that? Prices are still cheaper for products made over seas? What's that? No one wants to buy shitty domestic goods? What's that? You just pissed away our best chance at maintaining lower cost of living just to win a few votes from the rust belt? Good job Donny!

>I'm not a /pol/tard by any means

This is the equivalent of saying "I'm not racist but..." or "I have a Black friend but..."

You are convincing no one that you're not a /pol/tard when you preface your shit with this.

>By promising to bring back what amounts to 3% of the US GDP. Congrats you revitalized an aspect of the US economy no one except they people working in the factories cares about. What's that? Prices are still cheaper for products made over seas? What's that? No one wants to buy shitty domestic goods? What's that? You just pissed away our best chance at maintaining lower cost of living just to win a few votes from the rust belt? Good job Donny!

Thank God you people didn't win. Enough voters finally realized that Democrats are the enemies of working people.

I don't think you know what "preface" means, user. Hint: "pre" means "before."
Also don't try to tell me I could have made the same post minus the "I'm not a /pol/tard" and not been bombarded with "hurr gb2/pol/ fucking newfag /pol/tard."
2bh no matter what I say you're just going to find a cheap way to avoid responding to what I pointed out in my post.

>This is the equivalent of saying "I'm not racist but..." or "I have a Black friend but..."

I am from the South and it is quite common to both have black friends and hate black people. Get out of your little liberal enclave.

Because the working class is fucked you dumb ass. They decided long ago they'd rather work in shitty ass fucked up conditions then try and find some other means of income. What you think this was fucking sudden? You think this is new? Anyone who was paying attention in the 80s and saw the way technology was revolutionizing the computer could have told you that within a decade nearly everything made by hand would be useless and computers would be doing it all for us.

This same fucking track happened when the Guild system fell out of favor in replace of mercantilism. This is how fucking Capitalism works! Most productivity for the least amount of work for the lowest price!

But you're right. The party that want's to pretend its still 1948 and put everyone back to work in those useless jobs cares more about the populace than the party that at least recognizes people are going to need a hand and wants to give it to them while they figure there shit out.

>Sorry we outsourced your factory job.
>Why don't you learn to code then?
>Oh sorry we outsourced your coding job.
>Guess you deserved it, racist.

This is why you lost the election.

You realize that "we" you're talking about there is good old fashion Capitalism right? That holy divine means of economic achievement that every lower class hick prays to but doesn't realize is fucking them over every second of the work day.

Nah, better blame the Democrats instead.

>That holy divine means of economic achievement that every lower class hick prays to but doesn't realize is fucking them over every second of the work day.

That is why they voted for a trade protectionist (Trump) rather than a free-trade advocate (Clinton), right?

They voted Trump because he made them believe he was going to reopen their factories and put them to work. Not realizing that the factory went under because the goods it sold were too high and cheaper elsewhere.

Where as the free-trade advocate recognized that manufacturing is already fucked and can't be saved so it's better to make sure the prices at Walmart stay low so even Johny on Welfare can afford a shirt, shoes, TV, and lunch and maintain a decent life while he finds a new job.

nah thats you cuckfaggots. its really funny how dumb you sissies are, can't use reasoning to save your pathetic life.

>Not realizing that the factory went under because the goods it sold were too high and cheaper elsewhere.

Thus tariffs. Do you think I wouldn't pay more for some plastic shit if it meant I could have a decent job? I would and so would most other people.

>Where as the free-trade advocate recognized that manufacturing is already fucked and can't be saved so it's better to make sure the prices at Walmart stay low so even Johny on Welfare can afford a shirt, shoes, TV, and lunch and maintain a decent life while he finds a new job.

Yes, by making the prices stay low you are actively destroying the manufacturing base. Do you not see that this is all just a ruse to increase profits for multinational corporations? The politicians are not pursuing policies that are geared to help people, but to help their donors.

You've basically taken the last few decades of decline and reinterpreted them into a self-fulfilling prophecy. "We had to fuck over the manufacturing base because manufacturing was going to be fucked anyway."

Nine out of ten billionaires voted for Hillary.

>nationalist
You brainlets don't even stand a chance. How fucking retarded faggots are you I really can't comprehend. Don't even know the definition of fascism but wants to fight against it.

Except the Tariff could never make up the difference without spinning the whole thing into a trade war which just fucks everyone.

>I would and so would most other people.

Apparently not because buying American has always been an option but you don't see any new factories opening up now do you?

> The politicians are not pursuing policies that are geared to help people, but to help their donors.

Por que los dos?

The prices aren't going to change because the market's already decided where it's going to buy from. And that's from countries who don't give a shit about their workers so they can sell shit dirt cheap since they aren't paying livable wages or regulation fees. So unless you've got a way to magically make the price of production higher, or institute global working conditions nothings gonna be changing soon. Yeah CEOs and the millionaires reap the largest rewards but you also get to pay $400 dollars for a TV that would cost you $600 if made in the US.

The manufacturing base was fucked the moment we decided we wanted to throw "morals" into production and our competition didn't. Only resources the US has now are those it has a monopoly over.

It's Fordist, which America does have a bigger problem with. I really doubt the employee read Gramsci after it it (America and Fordism I think is the title, could be slightly out). If they had read Gramsci beyond that, they'd probably take issue with the dilution of meaning of the words "fascist" and "anti-fascist" and with the idea of forming one cultural hegemony to defeat another, which I also doubt to be the case.
The amount of anti-communist works on the list is hilarious though, especially if they think Trotsky's model was going to be better communism with less death than Stalin's.

>Except the Tariff could never make up the difference without spinning the whole thing into a trade war which just fucks everyone.

We are hit with tariffs by our "free-trade" partners already. Trade war then.

>Apparently not because buying American has always been an option but you don't see any new factories opening up now do you?

Hard to compete with government-enabled, slave-wage produced products. Self-fulfilling prophecy again. "We made it too expensive to start factories so the fact that you can't start a factory means we were justified in doing so."


>The prices aren't going to change because the market's already decided where it's going to buy from.

You mean the government failed to protect US workers in order to get campaign donations.

>And that's from countries who don't give a shit about their workers so they can sell shit dirt cheap since they aren't paying livable wages or regulation fees. So unless you've got a way to magically make the price of production higher, or institute global working conditions nothings gonna be changing soon.

Tariffs, etc.

>Yeah CEOs and the millionaires reap the largest rewards but you also get to pay $400 dollars for a TV that would cost you $600 if made in the US.

Then you force people to pay $600 for the TV.

>The manufacturing base was fucked the moment we decided we wanted to throw "morals" into production and our competition didn't. Only resources the US has now are those it has a monopoly over.

You mean when the government instituted regulations to fuck over manufacturing?

>regulations

I meant multilateral trade deals.

Good list, will protect you from the insanity of the SJW left. Not sure if that was intended by the author of the note though.

...