Help me solve this

You are such a fucking faggot.

Do you not agree? ._.

things can only be accurate within experimental observation. Newton didn't have access to the same level of measurement equipment Einstein did. Newton also had to invent calculus. Einstein didn't need to invent any of the math used in his theories. also, only recently have we been able to detect some of the things Einstein predicted.
this guy is right.

That's not my point.
I'm not saying Newton was bad or shouldn't be respected, because I think he was very important and his work was essential for the development of modern theories.
My point was, we should ALWAYS try to improve our models and try to reach that "100% accuracy", instead of saying "meh, 99.9% is fine, no one will notice"
I don't see why this is wrong..

Could be something using [math] \log\Gamma [/math]
It's a really convenient function for exp values

t. used to dev some shitty games in high school

you are welcome. carefully thought out and respectful comments raise the quality of the board.

I'm not arguing that your ideal is wrong. your heart is in the right place. This is my point:
it is impossible to achieve 100% experimental accuracy. measurement uncertainty is built into literally every experiment. moreover, it is not possible to prove that our Mathematical models are fact or just extremely good approximation. i agree with you that this is sad. as i said here i am a Mathematician. it is unsettling to know if what you do is grounded in reality, or just unsettlingly good approximation. you may find this interesting en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unreasonable_Effectiveness_of_Mathematics_in_the_Natural_Sciences

please read the thread before posting

youve demonstrated a profound lack of understanding of a variety of topics, im actually impressed how quickly my opinion of you sullied. kill yourself.

Pic related; It's from a shitty rpg I made years ago. The growth rates are extremely similar.

comp.dit.ie/smulligan/interpolation.pdf