So do you AI deniers think that consciousness is like some divine mystical force that comes from some divine mystical spiritual realm?
So do you AI deniers think that consciousness is like some divine mystical force that comes from some divine mystical...
Other urls found in this thread:
no.. ? do you even understand the arguments against AI? are you that dense? literally just google
Keep your sperging in the other thread
We don't even have a working theory of mind. What makes you think we're just going to stumble ass-backwards into creating one?
It's like Aristotle saying "give me a stable ground and a sufficiently large pole and I can move the world." "Give me enough transistors and enough time and I can create a mind." While true in essence it (intentionally) undermines both the insurmountable scale of the feat attempted and even the impossibility of some of the conditions.
While science (and natural philosophy) can easily reveal hints of what "is possible", getting there is another matter entirely.
A S P E R G E R ' S
Most AI deniers I've talked to say that consciousnesses is something more than physical and that there must be some kind of divine spark behind it.
Then you're talking to literal retards. For ai, you need the program to be self modifying in a non destructive way, or you need a massive code that accounts for all possibilities of perception and interaction. Both are mind boggling difficult to model. Current ai technology is still d2 bot tier.
Cant we just make a computer with vastly more connections then the human brain, then teach it how to evolve?
I was once thinking of something similar, create hardware platform however it may come that just offers 10 times the amount of neurons a human would have all interconnected but in a plasticity ready state.
Put as a core the scanned "brain" of a bee - then pressure that system to adapt to diverse situations, making it use more and more of the available "neurons" see how the core changes.
PENROSE