Which newspapers, magazines, and websites do you subscribe to? Which publications would you consider to be the most reliable sources for news? I subscribe to Private Eye and I've just bought a trial subscription to The Economist, although their pro-globalist stance has always raised red flags in terms of objectivity.
Trustworthy publications
Isaac Baker
Other urls found in this thread:
bild.de
twitter.com
Bentley Murphy
I'm a Canuck so I read The Star, National Post, and browse a few local papers (fuck metro land, also please employ me)
Outside of that I'll read the Walrus once and a while, Macleans, not many other magazines for news
Websites I'll usually read online versions of newspapers I read plus CBC for national news and BBC or Aljazeera for international news
Julian Price
Please be a troll.
Austin Davis
>Muh news source isn't """"""""""""objective""""""""""""
Kill yourself
I read IB Times, The Hill & Reuters for news, The American Conservative and The Week for propaganda and ProPublica and Public Discourse for bantz
Ryan Allen
Could anyone weigh in on the Financial Times? As far as UK publications go I haven't noticed an overt bias, unlike the Daily Mail (right wing half-truths or outright bullshit) or the Guardian (liberal cuckoldry).
Caleb Taylor
What is it you object to?
Do you read The Sun or something?
Carter Brown
It's pretty much the only sane daily in the UK. Worth every penny. The Economist is great too. There are biased views, but they're not trying to hide it or present as absolute truth and overall quality of journalism is usually high.
For German language I'd recommend SZ, FAZ and Die Zeit.
Robert Taylor
The Times and The Telegraph are the only respectable British publications, but they've got some absolutely retarded columnists that would be more at home with the Guardian.
The Mail on Sunday is kinda the opposite, they've got a couple of good columnists that get drowned out by shit.
Jaxson Smith
How's Bild? I've seen some high quality Daily Mail articles reference it occasionally.
Benjamin Russell
>The Posh Sun and The Torygraph are the only respectable British publications
Ian Barnes
t. Guardian reader
Colton Cook
It's Daily Mail style populistic trash. Not quite as insane, but really trying to be. If you want a good factual overview with little bias, then Spiegel is great.
Jayden King
my fucking sides when two french magazines got together with Facebook and Google to fight "against Fake News"
Fucking liberal cucks that lied about Trump 24/7 and chances are in such a state of cognitive dissonance never seen before lFAO
Jacob Torres
whatever don delillo reads
Austin Sullivan
/pol/ is the only trustworthy source for real information at this age
Nathaniel Gray
>What are Paul Joseph Watson's YouTube videos?
Carter King
unironically this.
Jaxson Cruz
M-M-MUGH-M-MUGH-MUGHRRR-MEEEHTEUUURGH
Kevin Cook
That picture doesn't contradict what the actual article says.
UH FOOOOKIN UR EYE NAHL
Hunter Gutierrez
CNN employ a similar tactic to the BBC, report wildly inaccurate "breaking" news, wait until they the initial hype has died down and then go full damage control on the article with corrections.
Owen Garcia
I only trust the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and Bloomberg.
Luke Ward
>The Washington Post
Its still shitposting even if your being ironic.
Brody Kelly
Foreign Policy
Financial Times
RT/Pravda
Aaron Roberts
t. Trumpian
They haven't led me wrong yet, and Bezos' wealth protects their journalistic integrity.
Samuel Ward
I'm not sure about that, A lot of the time it feels like people hate Bild because their willing to report what other outlets aren't.
For example:
bild.de
Anthony Diaz
Thanks mang, I think I'll buy a few copies of the FT and see if it takes me to a subscription. My only problem might be just how much of a chance I get to read it with my busy lifestyle.
Wyatt Perry
There is no quality daily worth reading in the UK any more. The telegraph and guardian are partisan as fuck. the mail is for retards who don't know they are retarded ('middle england'), the indy is now buzzfeed, and rrupert murdoch owns the times.
The observer isn't bad, but that's sundays only.
Jacob Gonzalez
L R B
R
B
Carter Hall
Hence my earlier question about the FT. It seems like an honest, in-depth read. I have no illusions about whether or not it has an agenda or political preferences, but at least it isn't 1,000,000 NIGGERS COMING TO OUR SHORES TOMORROW, BAN THIS SICK FILTH.
Kayden Watson
>The observer isn't bad
The observer is recycled content from the Guardian and the Independent.
Logan Davis
Everything is biased and you have to read a ton of different stories to get any semblance of accurate reporting. It's barely worth following current events. Exactly what the Jews want.
Levi Cruz
The way of thinkign that "its too hard to get reliable information so I dont do anythign" is exactly what powers that be want the average person to think
its a massive psy-op
that, hilarious enough, failed during Trump v Clinton
David Hill
I read the NYRB, and then some artices in the new yorker or the atlantic. you have to be careful with them the guardian is sometimes good
Brandon Gutierrez
Literally all the journals and sources mentioned in this thread are complete trash. Well, I guess if you follow this advice at least you won't be have to wonder about the veracity of the information kek.
But I especially want to point out that you should, under no circumstances whatsoever, fall for the LRB scam. It's the worst literary journal I have had the misfortune of being subjected to. It's worse than reading /r/books.
That said, TLS is decent. It's got its up and down, and there's usually a couple of great articles in each issue, and a couple of meh and occasionally terrible ones. But you have to live with that.
Thomas Collins
*ups and downs
Parker Bailey
The Economist is solid for keeping up-to-date on world affairs, but in tone it increasingly reads like the final dying (and often pathetic) screams of a crumbling world order.