So has Wildberger just completely given up proofs by induction since he won't use infinity? Or does he make 'finite induction' proofs, where he determines a statement holds only for a finite range of numbers? Because that would be retarded.
Is this guy seriously the only non-spooked mathematician in academia right now?
Xavier Myers
Ayden Williams
Looks like your ankles have been rankled, my friend.
Have you been reading too many math papers again? C'mon, man, that's bad for your eyes! You need to get out in the world. Ride a bike, work in a machine shop, learn welding. There's a beautiful, real, and practical world waiting for you out there. Get your head out of the clouds and lose the theoretical weight that's holding you back.
Dominic Ortiz
not him but the "who are you quoting" meme has never been funny
Bentley Sanders
>ultrafinite
Is there a proper definition of this term?
>meme
Nathan Perez
>Who said this? Why are you quoting it? Why did father never love me?
Easton Reyes
usually "there is a largest natural number" or "exponentation is not total"
Angel Price
I am that poster you are referring to. I'm failing to see why it needs to be written formally for it to be a property of numbers?
Austin James
have done most of the things you mentioned. Good thing you don't have to be a braindead eng*neer such as yourself to do that.
Ayden Peterson
>meme
maymay
Elijah Cox
>it is a property that mathematics cannot away from
Finally! someone brings up the TRUE definition of infinity. "That property that mathematics cannot away from."