Gravity: >the same since before the dawn of humanity >based on fundamental physical constants >simple equations govern most useful cases >complex models allow us to hit comets hundreds of millions of miles away >effects are easily observed and measured > > >still spending billions of dollars at cern figuring out how it works Anthropogenic Climate Change >only observed over a few centuries >elaborate empirical models >predictions constantly fail > > >the science is settled
Jaxson Hall
kys
Adam Carter
>only observed over a few centuries Only existed significantly over a few centuries. Are you trying to be misleading?
>predictions constantly fail Which predictions constantly fail? We've been accurately predicting global surface temps for several decades.
>the science is settled So gravity is not settled? You disbelieve gravity exists as described by physics?
Wyatt Evans
The Climate: >relatively the same since the dawn of humanity until now >based on fundamental physical constants >simple equations govern most useful cases >complex models allow us to predict the effect of various climate drivers >effects are easily observed and measured > > >still spending millions of dollars at figuring out how it works
Ian Lewis
>Can someone explain this to me? complex systems vs simple systems
/thread
Robert Long
The only thing that is "settled" is the observation that human activity is having an effect on the Earth's temperature and climate. You seem to be interpreting "settled" as meaning climatologists have basically dusted their hands off and declared their field to be over, which is so retarded I assume this thread must be bait.
Gavin Martinez
>Only existed significantly over a few centuries. Are you trying to be misleading? Just over one century, really. It was the industrial revolution that brought us the release of hitherto sequestered carbon into the atmosphere.
Austin Fisher
Gravity is a non-physical property of the physical, so it can only ever be expressed non-physically as a concept through models and equations etc, but they will never find any physical evidence of "gravity" itself, they will always be looking at the physical for the "clues". Now it's just a money maker, do bullshit experiments and get paid for it.
Climate science is also pseudo-science. Science doesn't work using "predictions", it hypothesis, it experiments, it gathers evidence. Climate science is missing a whole lot of experimentation because it can't fucking do it!
I expect many scientists have shares in green energy companies who are waiting to make a pretty penny.
Alexander Barnes
>settled um no huney bunz, try again.
Aiden Nguyen
What are you talking about moron?
>Gravity is a non-physical property Utter nonsense
>Science doesn't work using "predictions", it hypothesis, it experiments, it gathers evidence. Making predictions and testing them is an experiment you clueless retard. An experiment is simply an action which reveals data and/or tests a hypothesis. Climate science is founded completely on both.
