Whats the explanation, from a scientific standpoint, of the massive differences in penis sizes across different races? Why some races have big penises and some super small penises?
What did evolution mean by this? What benefit would suppose having a small penis so evolution goes towards that?
More resources for the parts that matter (the brain for example).
Is that completely true tho ? How much IQ do you need to work on rice fields ? Id say around 5.
What study is this from?
>How much IQ do you need to work on rice fields
muh dik bix nood
but penis needs blood priority only when erected.
>What benefit would suppose having a small penis so evolution goes towards that?
This question implies assumptions which are likely in error.
>How much IQ do you need to work on rice fields ?
That would depend: which end of the plow are you on?
Wh9ich often is the exact moment you might benefit from your brain working.
It's probably related to height. The taller the people, the bigger the penis. The African American distribution is skewed, since they were enslaved, so the ones with bigger dicks had higher chances at reproducing with their depraved masters. Other races didn't have this sort of selection, since they reproduced based on power, which does not correlate with dick size.
This data doesn"t worth jack shit. The graph (lack of smoothness) shows that the sample size was under ~50.
Link to a rigorous study (though not primarily about ethnic differences): onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Considering that Blacks (Africans & Abos) did not developed agriculture before the contract with Europeans. They did neither grow crops nor domesticated animals.
>
East Asians were the only Civilization besides European that passed through a feudal Society (medieval Lords & Knights n Shiet)
>
India, Islamic World, Native American & Southeast Asia were stuck in Iron Age/ Ancient World type of Civilization. Only East Asians & Europeans passed through a Feudal medieval Period.
Key quote:
>Lynn [31] suggest that penis length and girth are greatest in Negroids (sub-Saharan Africans), intermediate in Caucasoids (Europeans, South Asians and North African), and smallest in Mongoloids (East Asians), but this is based upon studies that did not meet our present inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Can someone actually link the study, or any reputable study on this? Everything I've heard was the average was 6", but they never state demographics
The study where OP's pic would come from is nowhere to find, only this graph on buzzfeed and other shit sites.
I linked the best article I could find.
Sample size n=15521.
TL;DR: You are most likely normal size.
>No source
Dropped.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
>There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study
Conversion table for 'Muricans
cm inches
1 0.4
2 0.8
3 1.2
4 1.6
5 2.0
6 2.4
7 2.8
8 3.1
9 3.5
10 3.9
11 4.3
12 4.7
13 5.1
14 5.5
15 5.9
16 6.3
17 6.7
18 7.1
19 7.5
20 7.9
21 8.3
22 8.7
Please, help me out, buddy! Am I shadowbanned, or what? It's like I'm invisible or something...
Nah, I see you.
Thanks!
>you need to be full neurotic when performing sex
literally the recipe for eternal impotence.
>There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study
thats fucking impossible. have you seen the BBC in porn? theres literally no asian with such sizes. stop deluding yourselves with unethical research.
>Considering that Blacks (Africans & Abos) did not developed agriculture before the contract with Europeans.
>Blacks didn't develop agriculture
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
sciencedirect.com
All you literally had to do was spend several minutes on Google.
Anyway to answer op's question the current best explanation is the sexual selection preferences of locally based populations. This was more than likely on average controlled and instigated by women since prehistoric times (this explanation is also used for why our anatomical sexual parts differ from primates). The varying averages (optimal growth within a local population) in penile size may also be influence by nutritional habits too but only in correlation with overall body growth.
The evidence for priority in resource allocation between the brain and penis growth is weak. Research in resource allocation seems to indicate that it would be between the brain and immunity system instead.
That's because Big Black Cock was made into a meme, a stereotype (a PHENOTYPE, if you will), and no one would watch porn with a small black cock, so producers don't even cast normie/beta niggas anymore. The sampling is not random at all.
On the other hand, in Asian porn the small virgin guy and the crying virgin girl is the stereotype.
Also, the faulty research was not (necessarily) unethical, just unprofessional.
A lot of those guys wear fake penises
howcome theres never any evidence behind these charts?
way to be blind to the truth. """science""" board, sure.
Science is about questioning and doubting, not about blind faith, you idiot.
You see something in a porn movie that vaguely resembles a penis, except it's three times as long, and you believe it without any second thoughts?
When the guy holds it at the stem with one hand *all the time*, you know it's a fake. Not all is fake, but there are many.
The belief that penis size varies according to race is not supported by scientific evidence
10.1111/bju.13010
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06806.x
don;t most of these studies rely on self reporting anyway?
Guys wouldn' be too comfortable with researchers resuming their dicks, save for the typical engineer
>self reporting anyway
Why didn't you bother to read the articles first wtf? why didn't you hesitate to make a Veeky Forums reply?
Porn industry is for middle and low class, just look Europe East women, simple a lot hot women don't need make porn as same hot men, BBC begins easy to reclute as porn actors.
resumen, hot white men with big cock don't need work in porn industry.
>that grammar
IT BURNS
Is there a name for this type of graph?
Smaller penis and testicle suggests harem-like structures. Larger penis and testicles suggests greater sperm competition within a given population at a point in time.
Average sized penises suggest complex social structures wherein fertilization is not dependent strictly on brute force or superior sperm volume / morphology and penile structure.
He types like a chinese person who is mediocre at english. For example, notice the lack of articles.
you're asking a question about biology, yet you started with the concept of "race"
ya blew it
the basic answer you want though is it suits the environment, flacid vs erect is also a factor
long flacid penis in northern Europe means you end up with frostbit and no penis (bergman and allen's rule) while the depth of the vagina also has an impact
Normogram, why is nobody reading the articles before posting? is this how this forum works?
>forum
The proper term is imageboard.
do you just post the same thing about blacks in every thread? I already told you in another one why you are wrong.
I'm in the 0% when flaccid???????????
are you some 120-IQ brainlet?
Whats the explanation, from a scientific standpoint, of the massive differences in skin colour across different races? Why some races have light skin and some dark skin?
What did evolution mean by this? What benefit would suppose having light skin so evolution goes towards that?
It's actually an anonymous image-based bulletin board