Well?

well?

Other urls found in this thread:

newspunch.com/florida-school-common-core/
zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-15/1746-american-adults-were-asked-point-out-north-korea-map-was-result?page=3
oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/building-skills-for-all-review-of-england.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

oranges are from florida!

>newspunch.com/florida-school-common-core/

Wish you people would source your screenshots when you make a thread using only a headline and not the content of the articles. Propagandist cunts.

Too many whites on that pictures.

>US Education

Doesn't mean much in the long run because what will happen to the school's standing after everyone drops common core?

Depending on its past rankings before it adopted common core it will more than likely fall back to mediocrity. Thus returning the problem to it's original state.

People who hate common core will see this as a victory though, but said victory is short live when the reality of the East Asian moon people and America's hat (Canada) is still shitting on them with PISA scores.

And no, kicking out all the brown people won't do shit because fucking Estonia which is basically homogenized northern european still gets buttfuck by every East Asian country except for maybe China because those bastards skew the numbers with their bullshit provinces and thus there's no accurate average for the whole country.

The whites are in front of the blacks. Which also explains the school's performance.

There are a couple of general problems with regards to deciding which is best for the country as a whole. There's no skirting around the issue that each community, and indeed each individual has a specific way in which it can be helped best in education. That might be focus on issues framed in the community, like learning plans that incorporate local industry, or picking the right literature to engage students the best.

In that sense, standardization attempts to force students into a mold that simply won't work for everyone. There is no 'one size fits all' education plan. Standardized tests seem to be fine- after all, it gives benchmarks for the levels students should be at in fields with set objectives like math or reasoning. Standardized curriculum however becomes a huge issue for teachers to try to meet on their end, and for students to find engaging, so common core has, over the few years it's been breathing, tried to make more wiggle room, albeit not nearly reaching the level of malleability that can meet student needs.

From a societal standpoint, there's something to be said about having standardized goals and curriculum. If every student has the same educational basis, then every post-secondary institution can take advantage of this and streamline curricula, which makes it actually easier to learn in the realm of college or trade school. You make the process more efficient, allowing for strong training, easier projected models for proficiency and economic movement, how many students in a projected class might go one way or another, etc.

I just don't know if it's society and the country that benefits the most from this kind of thing, or just the bureaucrats.

There are no blacks in that pic which really shows why the school did so good.

Some things are more important than "ranking".