Due to racist faggots on /b/, /pol/ and other boards always shitting on my group of people and impersonating them in slide threads/troll threads, I have a set of questions for you.
Can a totalitarian/autocratic nihilist society without religion and "ethics" in the way utilize unmoderrated science experiments to create things like clones with superhuman traits, mutants, or cyborgs?
Can a eugenics program make a group more logistic and smarter? (Extermination of those who follow cultures that damage the collective image of the group, selective breeding, and genetic modding/editing, forced to live a certain way by their society)
In a society which a woman must have a pregnancy license in order to have a child without the child being terminated and must score well on an IQ test to receive the license, will future generations be smarter?
If teen pregnancy numbers reduced to zero over time and toxic cultures were obliterated, would kids stop getting dumber as each generation comes into existence?
Is it possible to make smarter people, wipe out a landmass of dumb people, have those remaining survivors' genes bred out of them, and effectively have the progeny and engineered people replace the original inhabitants on that landmass?
Is it possible to make industrial/military technological advances in a totalitarian society without ethical religious oversight? (Advanced gauss/coil technology, small plasma reactors, clone armies with bionic enhanced bodies, robotic limbs with integral tools, genetically modified animals, cyborg animals, bioweapons that re-write genetic code, viruses that make people live longer, etc.)
Literally none of these questions are science related.
At best you'll get answers based on conjectures at worst you'll get some 16 year old brainlet soapboxing his stupid, r/Veeky Forums edgy, uninformed opinion.
John Hall
Are you serious?
I literally asked about eugenics and gene editing. That is science.
Hudson Stewart
>If teen pregnancy numbers reduced to zero over time and toxic cultures were obliterated, would kids stop getting dumber as each generation comes into existence? but older women are the ones with higher rates of down syndromes, eggs are best in teenage females
Christopher Peterson
I mean teens that should not be having kids at their ages.
Colton Moore
>Is it possible to make industrial/military technological advances in a totalitarian society without ethical religious oversight? (Advanced gauss/coil technology, small plasma reactors, clone armies with bionic enhanced bodies, robotic limbs with integral tools, genetically modified animals, cyborg animals, bioweapons that re-write genetic code, viruses that make people live longer, etc.)
>Scientific questions
In the same way that Isaac Asimov is scientific discussion.
Stop watching T.V. and maybe read a book sometime.
Jackson Brooks
why not?
Luke Davis
Many technologies were never pursued for warfare due to ethics.
Matthew Cooper
>society without ethics I don't think society can exist without ethics but that's a question for . >can society create clones, mutants, cyborgs Probably. >can eugenics make a group smarter Probably. >if teen pregnancy was reduced to zero would kids stop getting dumber as each generation comes into existence I don't follow. >is it possible to make smarter people by wiping out landmasses of stupid people >implying there are landmasses full of genetically stupid people
Isaiah Ramirez
Women have kids. Some dumb women have them. And they are grandmothers before they turn 38. Preventing these girls from having kids while being kids themselves will stop the dumbing down of future generations.
