Is it ethically permissible to remove healthy functional tissue from a nonconsenting minor?

Is it ethically permissible to remove healthy functional tissue from a nonconsenting minor?

Other urls found in this thread:

nypost.com/2017/03/08/new-case-of-neonatal-herpes-caused-by-jewish-circumcision/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Revival_in_the_English-speaking_world
dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3051982/Is-disgusting-beauty-trend-Salons-New-York-using-FORESKIN-treatments-fans-say-treatment-gives-Beyonce-level-confidence.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>ethics
Not science or math.

Medical ethics, retard.

Medical ethics is a subset of ethics, retard.

Still not science or math.

everything is math retard

Of course not. It's medieval.

Insightful

I really don't know why amerilards do this.

They like to cite hygiene as a reason, but surely cutting off a part of your dick and desensitizing it as a result is overkill when you could just wash your junk every once in a while?

Or are the Jewish overlords just pleased when the goyim are following their covenant?

Yes because it reduces the likelihood of contracting sexually transmitted diseases. And you know what sluts babies are.

Can any medfags chime in?