Simulate
Simulating Brain in a Computer Model or by Neutral Networks
en.m.wikipedia.org
Using more harder sciences as Math, Physics & EE to create a Computer Model for a Human Brain.
Describing thoughts mathematically or by more precise physical laws.
Not by Humanities & Philosophy bullshit.
Creating the breakthrough to create better Artificial Intelligences.
Simulating Brain in a Computer Model or by Neutral Networks
en.m.wikipedia.org
Using more harder sciences as Math, Physics & EE to create a Computer Model for a Human Brain.
Describing thoughts mathematically or by more precise physical laws.
Not by Humanities & Philosophy bullshit.
Creating the breakthrough to create better Artificial Intelligences.
I think that the only way to save psychology is to make it heavily based on mathematically rigorous physical models using Computational Neuroscience.
en.m.wikipedia.org
And to discard all SLOOPY Freudian Humanities bullshit.
I barely know any sloppy freudian stuff desu
>Neurochemistry aka the research on how Chemical Neurotransmissores such as dopamine, serotonin, GABA, & Noradrenalin affect our brains & neuronal cells are pretty much settled
Spoken like a true undergrad. Strict neurotransmitter-behavior relationships are now more under fire than ever. It's increasingly evident that single neurons can and do synthesize and release mixed populations of neurotransmitter and can even demonstrate neurotransmitter-specific microdomain terminal boutons on single axons of single neurons synthesizing multiple small-molecule NTs.
If behavioral pharmacology were this simple, all of behavioral neuroscience would have been settled 30 years ago and SSRIs would work perfectly. There is a reason people are increasingly interested in systems/circuit level function as a more coherent explanation of behavior.
You heard of variational bayes? Free energy principle?