>be extremely autistic
>be so autistic you literally die if people sass you and women show you their tits
>have zero chill and can't identify with normal humans whatsoever
>spend entire life trying to save humanity from dehumanizing social processes at the deepest most sincere and moral level possible
Be extremely autistic
Other urls found in this thread:
henryflynt.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
He was nevertheless right.
what kind of stupid name is adorno anyway
that is spanish for decoration
>despite all this be accused of wanting to spread trannyism
was he right about jazz
what do i do if i think adorno was right about everything but jazz
why can't we aspire to higher and higher forms of music and reach idealistic transcendence without sucking schoenberg's dick and listening to threnodies for hiroshima bullshit?
like, if i agree with adorno that beethoven is impossible under capitalism, do i have to enjoy beethoven for six days, and then progress to listening to jews banging on gongs in incomprehensible 357-tone patterns?
i don't want to be a stuffy traditionalist and be like "i agree, but only insofar as it vindicates listening to mozart for eternity." i like his progressivism, but he seems to want to progress into shit i don't like
Take the Flynt pill
Yes.
While some people may "like" Jazz, it is, indeed evil and infantile pop music for the exploitation and subjection of the masses.
i took one listen to some of that "twelve tone" garbage and it just sums up the entire modern leftist ideology: it's inharmonic garbage meant to befuddle anyone listening to it and destroy anyone unfortunate/stupid enough to be persuaded by the kike behind it into believing it has any actual value or beauty
thank the lord Trump won
He was right about the type of Jazz he had listened to, yeah, which was indeed mass-friendly, rhymically-simplistic pop. But it's silly to apply his critique to Jazz as an artform through Parker, Armstrong, Gillespie, Coltrane, et al.