How is the Blank Slate so popular?

>Deny biological differences in intelligences
>Deny biology has anything to do with performance in fields
>Blame environment/Whitey for Black failure and dysfunction

See also:

city-journal.org/html/what-criminologists-dont-say-and-why-15328.html

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/22/white-british-children-outperformed-by-minorities
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/black-immigrants-to-the-us-and-the-uk-blacks/
vdare.com/articles/yes-african-immigrants-do-better-than-american-blacks-but-it-wont-last
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/16/racism-in-university-admissions/
personneltoday.com/equality-diversity/discrimination/positive-discrimination-discrimination/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It feels the best and coincides with popular ideological teams

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

because white liberals fear the BBC

>Deny biology has anything to do with performance in fields

fucking out of context KEKEKEK

>Race is genetic and not a superficial category based on muh feels!
>Hispanic is a race of people with ancestry form Europe, Africa, and America.

Lel racists.

>conflating "biological differences" with "racial differences"
You'll never be taken seriously until you can understand the distinction

But I can tell genotype just by looking at phenotype! You just need to get gud. Racism makes sense.

>ALL DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE AND CRIMINALITY ARE FROM WHITEY MEN KEEPING DOWN TYRONE AND WOMYN

because the alternative does not conform to current political dogma.

[1/2]
It's a social Marxist "ideological" concept that everything in the world has no interpretation but that which is subjective; therefore, there is no objective value that can be deduced from anything; therefore, what is objectively true is subjective to the individual's interpretation.

It is following this line of logic, that gender must be a "social construct", because what it means to be a man or woman is subjective to the individual's experience, and not what the collective agrees it is.

This is obviously not true, as observable reality has clearly segregated the human species along a sex binary, as determined by our chromosomes; but to the social Marxist, science is an ideological construct that is nothing more than the consensus of individuals to attempt to attribute objective truth to a "subjectively" interpreted world.

SJWs deny observable reality in order to maintain the validity of their ideology.

I mean sure, genetics determines everything, and your environment determines which genes get expressed.

Certain subsets of the population like females will never express secondary sex characteristics of that of men (unless they have a genetic abnormality), and vice versa, and subsets of the population like Nigerians will never express intelligence like that of your average white European; because traits can't be expressed in individuals unless they have the genes for it.

Variation amongst IQs has already been broken down not just by nation, race and sex, but also by region as well. For example, the average IQ of someone in Wales vs. Manchester vs. London (assuming their heritage is "English").

Genetics determining everything is now widely accepted by anyone who claims to believe in science.

What you do with this information is entirely up to the individual.