>Ramapithecus: partial orangutan jaw passed off as a man
>Australopithecus: misidentified chimp/gorilla remains
>"Homo" Habilis: apes presented as people
>Homo Erectus: deformed hunans passed off as missing links
>Neanderthals: odd race of humans passed off as ape-men
>Cro-Magnon: regular humans
Really makes you think.
(((Evolution)))
Dominic Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
aeon.co
twitter.com
Benjamin Brooks
The problem with this kind of thinking is that, hypothetically speaking, if evolution was TRUE, you could still come up with these same complaints. Therefor the argument is worthless trash.
You just set up an imaginary point in the evolution of man and decided that everything before that point is just a mutant monkey and everything after that point is just a mutant human.
Justin Long
>Really makes you laugh
ftfy
Jordan Bell
get yer boards out everyone
Elijah Wood
So you're telling me that this somehow turned into a whale?
Camden Clark
Evolution is continuous, not discrete. These are only hallmarks of the evolution of the human race.
Isaac Lewis
No, that is an image. Images don't evolve into whales. This is common knowledge.
Christopher Gray
Explain trilobites boi
Alexander Kelly
>thinking an ad hom chart somehow takes away from what has been stated
In less than 4 million years, yes.
Variations within a kind=/=evidence for evolution.
Tyler Cox
Here is a quite accurate chart of the evolution of whales. Note that the time scale is in MILLIONS of years. If you take e.g. a generation time of 20 years you would have 2.500.000 generations that can slowly adapt to the environment over 50.000.0000 years.
Many people will not understand that evolution is a slow and gradual process. Human life span is too short to observe it for most species (although one can already observe significant changes of some populations within decades)
>So you're telling me that this somehow turned into a whale?
THIS thing (whatever it is) did not turn into another thing. This is another common misconception about evolution. The individuals of the population that had favourable traits were more likely to reproduce and pass on their genes. This went on over generations with each individual of the population looking very, very similar to its parent and offspring generation. After many generations (thousands or even more) you would see significant addaptions to the aquatic environment, like feet turning into fins......
There are some other important factors to it and once you will start reading more about evolution you will start to realize that the evidence for it is tremendous. Maybe read a book like "the greates show on earth" from Richard Dawkins if you want to know more