Can any comp-sci explain if this is true or not?

Can any comp-sci explain if this is true or not?

What's the big deal?

Bio-women have already been hacked.

What kind of sex doll has a fucking knife attached to it.

>Researcher
>warns that technology that doesnt exist yet could attack us if hacked
What "research" was done?

>Eventually feature online connectivity
?? Do you need to turn ur waifu on at work and tell her to put on a sexy dress and wait by the door when you come home?

> tfw future sexbots could kill users if current government built-in backdoor routines work as expected

I'm not sure why you'd have to be a comp-sci to answer this question, but since I am I guess I will offer my opinion.

Depending on the physical capability of the "sex robots" it is certainly possible to make it kill. Remember that AI is merely a more complicated program. In fact, cars could also be hacked and be used to drive in to people if we get driverless cars.

>In fact, cars could also be hacked and be used to drive in to people if we get driverless cars.
Isn't this kind of a huge issue, seeing as driveless cars will be reality pretty soon?

Yes, but that will just mean more attention will need to be paid to debugging and cybersecurity. Technically there are many things already in place that, if hacked into, could lead to deaths.

>sex robot can do what normal women can do

Neat

Why give the robot enough grip strength to strangle you or whatever anyw- oh wait oh ok I see.

I'm looking forward to driverless cars, first such incident and we will finally *have to* (hopefully this will be a law) formally verify the software we use. It should have been the standard 30 years ago, but mathlets took over and we're in this abhorrent state now.
Please release driverless cars asap so i can use them to kill people and bring us the paradise of safe software.

Have fun being a slave to Skynet

Absolutely. In fact I know a lab working on robust knife manipulation and handling algorithms for uncertain snd adversarial environments.

So far they've been able to get disembowlment down to 7 seconds and they say there's no reason they couldn't do it in 2 with better actuators.

t. bullshitter

Is it some fundamental law of the universe that burgers can't into sarcasm? Or does it stem from their self-centered worldview? Where does it come from and how do we teach them the ways?

It's quite obviously true but, there's the question why you would let a sex bot connect to the internet. Are you going to live stream your sex with it?

Is there some fundamental law of the universe that obsessed yuropoors have to whine about Americans at every opportunity?

seething

Lots of things could kill you of hacked. Some modern cars killed people because the throttle got stuck. Not a hack but someone could make it happen.

Software architect here. But you don't need me to tell you the obvious. Yes, anything and everything can theoretically be hacked, as long as there's a way to access it. Even without online features, gaining physical access to the device such as bugs, or sabotage from development to factory to delivery, even from breaking and entering could result in a hacked product without the user knowing the first thing about it. The risks can be minimized to the point of being negligible, but they will always be there.

Sure, but the risks will be minimized. The same argument can be used here as with any software error: Even if the occasional car is sabotaged, the overall safety of driverless cars will still far exceed the situation we have now.

It's kinda like airplanes really. You don't even have the illusion of control there. You know that if something goes wrong, you're gonna die and there's no way around that. But the odds of that happening are incredibly low.

At any rate, sex bots are far, far away from even remotely replacing real women. The level of robotics and AI required for that, especially at a consumer-friendly price are some 20+ years away at least, not to mention the shitstorm that will be the legislation around it. The initial primary consumer group of sex bots will be lonely men or rich eccentrics. A few rich eccentrics won't be enough to make a difference, and lonely men have never in all of human history had any sympathy for any of their issues.

Meanwhile both women, and the societies at large will have a very real threat in sex bots. Women for obvious reasons, they fear objectification, replacement, and in general feel no sympathy for the average man's sexual urges or need for company. While societies are already facing increasing declines in birth rates, making it detrimental for them to pursue something that could exponentially increase the problem in near future.

So I'd stick to dating sims and porn if I were you.

What kind of sex robot wouldn't have grip capabilities?

Maybe. Maybe you also want to install operations that have been devised by other users, or voices, etc.

Obviously. Everything will be online in the near future. Privacy issues aside, it's a simple question of practicality.

>Maybe. Maybe you also want to install operations that have been devised by other users, or voices, etc.

Not really. The main point is that any real even rudimentary AI-driven software on the level we're talking about here will need a lot of computational power, storage, and a shitload of data.

In simple terms, that AI won't be housed inside that robot, but in some manner of cloud. All the language banks, personality, behavioral routines, everything will come from there. I don't like it any more than any of you do, but it's basically unavoidable.