What's the consensus on carbon dioxide being a greenhouse gas? Are there respectable scientists that deny it?

What's the consensus on carbon dioxide being a greenhouse gas? Are there respectable scientists that deny it?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Mc_4Z1oiXhY?t=47m35s
skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

go read a first year chemistry book
it's not complicated

Good bait 10/10.
You're more likely to get the responses you desire from Veeky Forums or /pol/. In fact, stay there.

If I wanted to know what the mainstream hypothesis is I wouldn't have made this thread.

>What's the consensus on carbon dioxide being a greenhouse gas?
That it's a greenhouse gas.

>Are there respectable scientists that deny it?
Few scientists deny something that you can easily measure in the lab over the course of an hour, user.

No one disputes that CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

There is some contoversry, with way to many people on both sides taking their opinions from politicians, and clinging to it for unrelated political motives, over how much of a problem we're creating by upping the amount of CO2 gas in the atmosphere.

Then why isn't global warming more severe if CO2 levels keep rising steadily? Are the oceans accumulating heat and/or CO2?

Science isn't about allegiances. There is the data and the mechanisms proposed to explain them and interpret them. Who does it doesn't matter. Your question should be if there are any plausible alternative observations the properties on carbon dioxide that disprove it as a greenhouse gas or strong critisisms against CO2 having greenhouse gas properties. The answer to that is no btw

That's the point, tard. Rising CO2 levels are making the world warmer from "baseline" C02 levels.

if Sulfur dioxide can cool the earth's weather, cant they just pump out more sulfur dioxide in air? I mean there are already numerous cases of volcanoes cooling the earth's temperature especially when Tambora erupted AKA the Year without a Summer