>Automation

>>Fruit picking will be robotized soon, just as romaine harvesting is being automated.
its already automated.

problem is that illegal labor is dirt cheap, 1 dollar an hour to pick any fruit/vegetable is insane.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/12/the-politics-and-demographics-of-food-stamp-recipients/

statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

None of whom are Niggers or Achmeds.

Driverless cars are closer than you realize...

uh no

who's gonna make me be part of their botnet? I DARE elon musk to try to take our cars

but with AI, we don't need people to think as much to do jobs that high IQ people used to do.

>get skills and blah blah blah high education
Meanwhile finance and the highest skill wall street jobs are the ones going away.

I think that a rail system for cars or capsules is a better solution than relying on sensors to drive the cars, and it's less likely to fail.
Cars with only sensors will come first but i think it should later be upgraded to rails.

Automation and profits can go to hell. They will mean nothing if humans become jobless and poor, unable to afford anything.

A better solution is to decrease the world population by restricting the number of children parents can have so they don't end up jobless and poor.
China is already doing this, they fist restricted parents to one child then upgraded it to two.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-child_policy

>can't list any contributions by Niggers and Achmeds in an Automation Society

Getting rid of car ownership and submitting to the botnet means we would save money and get to buy sick ass off-road vehicles or really anything else.

>Typical /pol/ poster thinks only "the blacks" will be obsolete
>Ignoring the 5+ million white males employed by the trucking industry

Nigga one child policy was a disaster for China.

That law compels parents to kill unwanted children so have fun trying to convince the religious population to be for it.

We should want the human population to grow honestly, modern social security and similar programs work perfectly fine provided the population grows at a decent rate. It's like a pyramid scheme. If anything there should be a one or two child minimum policy. A growing population would also provide us with more scientists and add pressure to colonize the rest of the solar system.

That's because China is still a developing country, these laws for First World countries would be great.

So they already are unproductive but they still exist and get welfare. I don't think anything will happen to them. Many whites though will lose their jobs.

Parents after getting the limit of children could use some type of contraceptive, governments could maybe even pay for Vasectomies or Tubal ligation.

This is expected to happen anyway.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate

>falling for the car meme

it was only a temporal solution whilst trains and aircraft improved. they will be obsolete within 30 years.

>, what is to be done with the obsolete "underclasses"
Nothing, really.
You just let their birth rates stagnate and diminish until the socioeconomic system reaches equilibrium.

I genuinely want FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM

That won't work in a democratic society since you're infringing on body autonomy of a person. And again, this won't pass with the majority of religious communities in your country.

>(like Blacks)

And like whites, Indians, gypsies, sandniggers...etc. Anyone who is not a superior Jewish Ashkenazi stereotype will be useless 30 years from now, and it would be best for the future of humanity if we mass genocide gentiles so the chosen ones can live in an utopic golden age that'll propel humanity to the stars.

People from developed countries care less and less about religion it's something that could eventually fade out.
Some religions have to give in to certain laws even if they don't like it, like the Abortion law.

But it looks like when people become smarter they also have less children so they can give fewer a better life

>birth rates stagnate
that's not how stupidity works, user.
>i'm dumb
>i'm poor
>having kids is not the best idea
>but i'm horny and too stupid to correctly assess the risk of pregnancy of unprotected sex!
>*sprouts 5 kids*
meanwhile high IQ """"liberated"""" women won't have any because of nihilism and lack of values past egoism & consumerism in modern society.

>inb4 they start marrying down with lower class men.

>Jews
>humanity

pick one.

You're not getting my gold to make superconductors to go back to your jew planet

You're stuck here with me, Morty.

You are literally talking about a type of machine that could end the need for human labor and then you reflexively ask what is to be done with the people who don't earn large quantities of money?

I'm sorry but I look at every management position as being a worthless job. Every CEO and all shareholders just sit there with cash and then tell other people what to do. They aren't inventing or revolutionizing things for other people. They are just paid large sums to be meticulous and fire the people who bog down the company.

I am more concerned about the people who are getting wealthy from skimming off the top and ruining other peoples lives than I am the needy and poor who don't even have the resources or knowledge to pull themselves out of their plight.

You want blacks gone but you're ready to welcome Japanese people as "honorary master race". Most people in the modern day think that the ancient Indian caste system is a horrific nightmare but somehow even at the cusp of this marvel of a technological advancement that could finally free people from poverty all you can think about is re-instituting an old divisive taboo. You're looking forward to having a fix for the large scale of production required to provide food, clothes and shelter to an amazing amount of human beings but then you want to turn around and start splitting people apart based on race and supposed usefulness?

>its already automated.
fucking this. are you people dumb?

apart from making some robot humanoid, which will probably be cost-prohibitive, it already IS automated.

What's the result of this automation? The industry GROWS. They dont lay people off, they dont fire lots of people because of automation, they expand to make more money. The people that do get laid off because of automation get laid off because of the companies poor management. If you cant retrain somebody either you have too many personal, or the employee is an idiot.

The only reason to let people go because of automation is if it has been according to plan since the hiring of the employee, ex. a large scale switch to automation. And even then it is still prudent to have multi-role employee's who can drive a forklift, perform maintenance, package, or what have you. One employee or: a robot forklift, a robot QA, a robot manager...etc

And then you also have the glaring single point of failure with machines breaking. Ex. a forklift malfunctions, the human operator can still perform actions that benefit the company, even if there are no more forklifts.

Actual automation in the industry is not complete. There is always some human component to back it up, whether it's maintenance techs, or people directly interacting with some part of the machines line. It's just sensible because failure happens, and then you lose money. You lose less money if there's some dude who fix it soon or perform the function of the machine himself.

>maybe not forthe likes of Japanese
In the contrary, automation is how they are solving the problem...

They won't do mass immigration

Do I sound like I care?

It's only flaw was that they didn't target both male and females instead of just females.

>religious

>Cucks and Sandniggers

We shouldn't be letting Achmeds into any respectable country. And the Churches have been cucking themselves for decades (see the Catholic opposition to birth control in Africa and other mudpits).

>Jewish Ashkenazi

Remember that Ashkenazi aren't really Middle Eastern. They're mongrels.

they will have automatic helicopter rides for commies like you in the future.

Why don't you read an economic 101 book before spewing more crap

Put them on treadmills and have them generate clean energy. NIggers can run fast if nothing else so this might actually be an extremely powerful source of energy given that there's billions of them on Earth.

This is why you look both ways when crossing the road.

But first world countries (nonwhites aside) have piss-poor birthrates already.
If you're concerned about overpopulation then you need to do something about Africa, the Middle East and India.

>Israel average IQ
>95
Reminder to all that the ANGLO is the most powerful race.

It's really just Nigger Africa (North Africans like Moroccans and Egyptians aren't Niggers). The Mideast, East Asia, South America and South Asia's births have been going down.